|Where are my backlinks?|
| 6:36 am on Jun 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
A few years ago I spent a great deal of time registering with directory sites and trading links with other sites, but even now (years later) when I do a "link: and my url" only one link shows. How can I figure out what the problem is?
| 6:47 am on Jun 2, 2006 (gmt 0)|
The stock answer is that when you use the link: operator, Google has never listed all the links that they have in their index, but only a sampling. This is done in good part to protect their algo from reverse engineering, because the Google algorithm is extremely sensitive in the area of links and link text/reputation.
While that's still true, I've recently seen some pretty extreme discrepencies between what Yahoo reports (for example 3,200) and what Google reports (same example, 2). Looks to me like something even crazier than usual is going on with the link: operator.
At any rate, I never look to Google for anything like accurate and complete information on your backlinks. They usually know about almost all of them, but they're not talking, at least not in public.
| 3:00 pm on Jun 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
As long as you are seeing what you are expecting to see in eiether MSN or Yahoo, then everything should be fine. Google does not always show all backlinks.
| 3:16 pm on Jun 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I've noticed that yahoo + MSN show a lot of links, but a lot are spammy.
Google shows very few (most of which origionate from the website your testing if indeed you link to your home page using an absolute link) - but at least their not spam.
Use yahoo + MSN to see which Spam sites link to you!
| 4:49 pm on Jun 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I never used the link: command for search purposes, I just used it to check my site's backlinks. All of that changed today.
Whilst doing research I found a link to a site containing some useful data, it was like site.com/dir1/dir2/0.html. It was a plaintext file in html. Some of the data was missing, so I figured it would be on another page. I tried manually entering in 1.html but it was a different set of data... I tried browsing the top directory but permission denied. So where was the missing data I needed to find!?
I thought I will use the google link command, to see what page on their site links to the data set - I figured it would contain links to the other sets of data. The link: command turned up nothing. Not even the site I followed the link from.
Just thought I would share this; it was a valid use of the link command, and because google filter the command I could not find the information I was looking for. Isn't google's aim to organise the world's information!?
Anyway, it's the first time I have been unhappy with google's service out of its entire time of operation so I'm not complaining!.