homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 174.129.76.87
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

This 176 message thread spans 6 pages: < < 176 ( 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 > >     
Somethings Up Right Now! -- 30 domains just went "home page only"
tiori

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 10:01 pm on May 2, 2006 (gmt 0)

All of my websites (30 of them) now show only the homepage when doing a site:www.domain.com .....

This just happenned within the last hour. Previously had thousands of sup's and regular pages.

 

ramachandra

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 4:46 am on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

[72.14.207.99...] having only 3 pages in Index and out of 3 pages 2 pages are home page, one with root as www.mydomain.com and another is www.mydomain.com/index.asp I think Google is still hanging with canonical problem with the sites.

Anyone noticing the canonical issues on this DC?

MLHmptn

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 5:32 am on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

And yet again, 72.14.203's are no longer showing the 2nd set of SERP's. Can someone tell me what is going on? :>~ I just really want to know!

coosblues

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 6:19 am on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

My site almost doubled in the number of pages indexed on 72.14.203.99 which seems to be quite different than what most are seeing these days. I can only hope that sticks, but I know what is good for one can spell disaster for another - good luck.

taps

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 9:41 am on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

Ok, there is something going on. Had a huge dupe content problem in Feb 2005, solved in May 2005. Had many supplementals after that.

Now all data from the "wrong" URLs are deleted. For my non-www-URL I see three result sets.

For example:
64.233.161.107 - 365 results (bad)
64.233.171.99 - 1 result (better)
64.233.189.104- 0 results (great)

All supplementals seem to be gone. Don't know if that has an influence on my regular serps. But it is nice to see Google cleaning up their results.

Dayo_UK

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 9:48 am on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

Anyone else had their homepage dropped (or reverted to a very very old cache) depending on the DC - while internal pages remain indexed?

tigger

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tigger us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 9:49 am on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

about the only thing thats not happened yet Dayo

Steph_R

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 10:53 am on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

"Anyone else had their homepage dropped (or reverted to a very very old cache) depending on the DC - while internal pages remain indexed?"

Yes. Just happened last night.

djmick200

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 2:38 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

72.14.203.99 is returning a better number of pages indexed for my "pages missing" site.

site:www.mysite.tld - 507 pages
site:www.mysite.tld/ - 507 pages
site:mysite.tld - 507 pages
site:mysite.tld/ - 507 pages

ALL return the same amount of pages with NO supplementals.

My default at present is 66.249.93.104 and is showing

site:www.mysite.tld - 285 pages
site:www.mysite.tld/ - 275 pages
site:mysite.tld - 337 pages
site:mysite.tld/ - 272 pages

The 2 above without the trailing slash have supplemental pages.

On both DCs my ranking search terms havent changed. Not all the extra pages are ranking well plus I notice a lot of the results on both DC's are using on page text in the snippet and not the meta descrption - all those pages using the on page text have an April 29th cache date.

Changing times by the look of it.

[edited by: djmick200 at 2:49 pm (utc) on May 3, 2006]

BillyS

WebmasterWorld Senior Member billys us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 2:42 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

djmick200 - Glad to see someone else seeing the same thing I mentioned back in msg. #28.

g1smd

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 2:52 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

I assume that site:domain.com -inurl:www now returns zero results.

If it does, then your problems are fixed (in that DC at least).

djmick200

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:01 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

I assume that site:domain.com -inurl:www now returns zero results.
If it does, then your problems are fixed (in that DC at least).

Not sure what to try but i done both of these on 72.14.203.99 -

site:www.mysite.tld -inurl:mysite.tld returned no results
site:mysite.tld -inurl:www.mysite.tld returns 269 results, all supplemental.

g1smd can you tell me what that means? I haven't a clue.

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:17 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

I don't see any difference in supplemental results on DC 72.14.203.99 for our site.

One thing I have noticed is our rankings drop again on this DC...

g1smd

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:27 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

The "experimental" 72.14.207.99 results that had spread over to 72.14.203.99 yesterday are no longer there today. The latter DC has reverted back to "normal" BD results now.

arnarn

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:28 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

I think it would be worthwhile when reporting supplementals information if there could be some comment on "good" supplementals vs. "bad" supplementals, where "good" supplementals are those that would ideally be retained (i.e. unique and of value), vs "bad" supplementals which are old or actually missing or have been replaced with something else or a result of REALLY duplicate content.

Is there any consensus at this point whether G is getting rid of the old and removing the "supplemental" tag from the "good", or are they just removing supplementals, period..?

My hope is that G is trowing out the bad and keeping the good as non-supplemental? Actually, I my hope is that they just get rid of "supplemental" totally!

-

[edited by: arnarn at 3:36 pm (utc) on May 3, 2006]

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:35 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

64.233.167.99 is showing the cleanest results..

Is this spreading to any other DC's?

Is anyone seeing any supplemental results on this DC?

Kangol

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:41 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

F_Rose,
I also like 64.233.167.99. It seems that people here are more interested in 72.* DCs where my site ranks only for obscure terms.

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:44 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

Could anyone answer me why are you more interested in 72 DC's, what good are you seeing in these DC's except for a total mess..

[64.233.167.99...] is nothing but perfect..

Correct me if I am wrong...

300m

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:48 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

I was under the impression that 2 dc's were going to be popping in and out on the serps for the next couple of weeks running different data sets.

I would be more inclined to accept that from what I watch as serps are dancing daily for the past week at least.

arnarn

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:49 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

[64.233.167.99...] appears to us to have only a first level directory scan of the site, with everything else GONE.

So, maybe you're best off if you put all of your pages at the first level -- that way you'd get all of your pages indexed. I've seen some sites where that's exactly what they do and they rank VERY WELL!

-

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:51 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

"So, maybe you're best off if you put all of your pages at the first level -- that way you'd get all of your pages indexed."

Please explain in detail..

Thank you..

phpdude

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:52 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

[64.233.167.99...]

Might be perfect to you, but to me it stinks.

Kangol

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 3:57 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

That's not the point.
I do not see a difference in supplementals between 72.14.203.99 and 64.233.167.99/72.14.207.99. Why is 72.14.203.99 better?

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 4:07 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

"http://64.233.167.99
Might be perfect to you, but to me it stinks."

Please let me know what issues stink the most in this DC?

wheelie34

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 4:13 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

"http://64.233.167.99
Might be perfect to you, but to me it stinks."

Looks good to me ;0 main competition moves down, I move up, hopefully thats the future, results look good in my sector, travel & tourism

phpdude

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 4:42 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

For the area I watch, that DC has heavily rewarded sites that have purchased 1000's of site wide links from other sites.

In the other DC's, that effect is dampened.

At least for the area I'm interested in.

The saying "One mans gargage is another mans treasure" is very true when it comes to DC watching.

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 4:43 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

Does 64.233.167.99 look like the future? Is it spreading to any other DC's?

To me it looks as an experimental DC, or perhaps that DC G is keeping as a clean copy, sort of a backup of clean results..

Who knows?

tigger

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tigger us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 5:09 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

the crazy thing is 64.233.167.99 is showing my site ranking 10th for a competitive term but showing less pages than .com where as the same term on .com is 19th

g1smd

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 5:18 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

The DC at 64.233.167.99 is now giving out the "experimental" results that have migrated to other datacentres from 72.14.207.99 in recent days.

F_Rose

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 5:23 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

"The DC at 64.233.167.99 is now giving out the "experimental" results that have migrated to other datacentres from 72.14.207.99 in recent days."

If that's the case, is it worth watching this DC? Will it migrate to more DC's eventually?

tigger

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tigger us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 5:25 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

it maybe experimental but its still not pulling my dropped pages back

g1smd

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 34136 posted 5:27 pm on May 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

It did migrate to a large number of DCs yesterday, but is not seen on many of those today.

This 176 message thread spans 6 pages: < < 176 ( 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 > >
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved