homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.235.39.132
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
The Google related: Command
Strange results, should I be worried?
BillyS




msg:745869
 12:30 am on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

I was just looking though sitemap and the index stats page shows all of the standard Google commands such as site: and link:. Out of couriosity I ran the site: command.

In the past, I used to see those websites that were in the same Dmoz category as my website. I'm looking at these today and they really don't make much sense to me. The Google definition is:

Pages that are similar to your site - uses the related: operator to return a sample list of pages that we consider similar to your site.

Should I be worried about the results of the related: command? Is anyone else seeing strange results since Big Daddy rolled out? Is there any "trick" to helping Google figure out which sites are actually related to your site?

 

tedster




msg:745870
 4:36 am on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

Yes, the related operator gives some very squirrelly results these days -- in some cases. As a general rule, the more loosely related your inbound links are, the more difficulty Google has seeing important relationships. But some of the Big Daddy data looks like it may be suffering from more than off-topic backlinks.

selomelo




msg:745871
 10:03 am on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

Last year, I asked a backlink from a webmaster for whom I offered some services. She complied, generously! She gave me a site-run backlink in the footer area. The site was template-driven.

And now, although they have nothing in common, Google thinks that her site(s) are related.

I also observed that the number of pages containing a particular backlink is a critical factor in determining "related" pages. I just checked my related pages, and I saw that all related sites have more than one page with a backlink to my site, without exception. Even some directories are counted as related, as they have multiple pages (under different categories) with a link to my site.

But this is an isolated observation, and needs confirmation to be generalized.

BillyS




msg:745872
 11:35 am on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

>>I also observed that the number of pages containing a particular backlink is a critical factor in determining "related" pages.

I'm seeing this too. For example, several of the "related" sites are where my RSS feeds are located. To say my site is similar to a site that publishes RSS feeds is silly.

angiolo




msg:745873
 1:12 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

I see one of the my site that shows two-three UNRELATED site with the command related.

Those UNRELATED sites do not have any link pointing to my site. I am a little bit worried because those UNRELATED sites are medicine sites....

BillyS




msg:745874
 11:29 pm on Mar 30, 2006 (gmt 0)

>>I am a little bit worried because those UNRELATED sites are medicine sites....

That's my question. How worried should we be if the sites are not related?

Nikke




msg:745875
 6:23 am on Mar 31, 2006 (gmt 0)

The related command shows your actuall web cluster.

If many sites link to yours, you might also see other site that the sites linking in to you are linking to.

(How to make sense of this?)

Your site: A

If B, C and D links to your site and also link to X and Y, then X and Y will be seen as related to your site. (A, B and C might or might not show up as related though, unless they have good PR.)

glengara




msg:745876
 8:28 am on Mar 31, 2006 (gmt 0)

As mentioned it's basically a thumbnail of your linkage, it never worked as intended as it was based on the premise that linking would be topical ;-)

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved