homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.62.132
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Cache gone for most non-www pages
is this a step in the right direction?
suzie250




msg:763828
 4:17 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

I've been working on trying to get all non-www pages removed from Googles index which are also supplemental.

The redirect seems to be working ok on most pages but a few just seem to be stuck.

Today I have noticed that many of the non-www versions still hanging around no longer have a cache.

Do you think this is a step in the right direction or what?

Thanks,
Suzie

 

steveb




msg:763829
 9:12 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

No. Makes no difference.

lammert




msg:763830
 9:48 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Yesterday for one of my sites all the supplementals were gone from the index, today they are all back. Also cache for those pages disappears en reappears again depending on the time of day, and weather forecast. Re-check tomorrow, the cache will probably be back.

Unfortunately there has been no single post on this board about any real progress in the supplemental issues of Google, except for the temporary glitch where whole sites went supplemental a few weeks ago and GoogleGuy personally interfered.

Need More Hits




msg:763831
 10:42 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Internally I link to my pages as wiget.htm not [mysite.com...]
Is this considered the canonical problem? Internal linking?

Please excuse my ignorance on this issue.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Brad

tedster




msg:763832
 11:09 pm on Mar 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

lammert, you may have missed the positive reports in the swarm of other posts, but I have read several. Just recently, see [webmasterworld.com...] mssg #183 from Grinler.

Brad (Need More Hits): relative linking does not, in itself, mean you will have a canonical problem. Do a site:example.com query and see if there are any pages listed by more than one url -- with and without index.html, or with and without "www" for instance.

lammert




msg:763833
 11:32 am on Mar 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

tedster, with "except for the temporary glitch where whole sites went supplemental a few weeks ago" I was referring to the BigDaddy supplemental problem where some positive results have been seen.

Sorry for being not more precise.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved