Miop
msg:721340 | 10:11 am on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0) |
< Miop, are you all supplemental? > No. I have two other all supplemental sites, and they have not even been cached since last August. I can't seem to persuade googlebot in, whatever I do.
|
Hissingsid
msg:721341 | 10:54 am on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Hi, Do we have a list of the live BD DCs? These two appear to me (in my niche) to be giving results which I was seeing on google.co.uk and google.com default between mid January and mid February.
64.233.161.105
64.233.161.147 These three are giving what I hoped would settle down as the new BD results.
64.233.171.99
64.233.171.104
64.233.171.147 All 5 return giants.mlb.com at #1 for the search <sf giants> Up until 2/27 all five were giving the results I'm now seeing on 171.99, 171.104 and 171.147. I was feeling quite positive about BD, now I'm just confused. Best wishes Sid
|
jenkers
msg:721342 | 5:50 pm on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0) |
if the sf giants search is still valid then the following 'should be' BD DC's: 64.233.179.99
64.233.179.104
64.233.183.99
64.233.183.104
64.233.185.99
64.233.185.104
64.233.187.99
64.233.187.104
64.233.189.104
64.233.161.105
64.233.161.147
64.233.171.99
64.233.171.104
64.233.171.147
216.239.37.99
216.239.39.99
64.233.167.99
64.233.167.104
216.239.39.104
216.239.37.104 these others should be non-BD: 216.239.53.99
216.239.57.99
216.239.59.99
66.102.11.99
66.102.9.99
66.102.7.99
64.233.161.99
64.233.161.104
216.239.53.104
66.102.11.104
66.102.9.104
66.102.7.104
216.239.57.104
216.239.59.104
216.239.63.104
216.239.57.98
216.239.57.105
216.239.59.105
66.102.7.105
216.239.57.147
216.239.37.147
66.102.7.147
64.233.167.147
|
angiolo
msg:721343 | 9:30 pm on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0) |
My questions: - Are the NOT "BD DC's" moving to "BD DC's"? - Is this google behavior connected to google site-map? In other words: maybe Google is telling to webmaster to delete all "lost" pages, "garbages". Maybe Google want to save space: they do not want to index "lost" page...
|
maha
msg:721344 | 9:44 pm on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0) |
BD results suppose to be moving non-BD over time. That's whole purpose of these data centers.
|
angiolo
msg:721345 | 9:54 pm on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0) |
You mean that in few weeks we will see only BD results everywhere. Is it right?
|
watercrazed
msg:721346 | 9:56 pm on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0) |
That the plan, but I hope not the supplemental issue in current BD is a killer.
|
Blade3
msg:721347 | 5:12 am on Mar 4, 2006 (gmt 0) |
On BD datacenter, my site appears at 19th page (10 results per page). But in Non BD datacenters, it is nowhere. Anyone experienced similar situation?
|
Liane
msg:721348 | 9:38 am on Mar 4, 2006 (gmt 0) |
For those of you worried about the supplemental issue, see DaveIFG's post here:
[webmasterworld.com...] This thread was supposed to have been to discuss Big Daddy Observations, Analysis and Remarks but seems to have been hijacked for discussion of the "supplemental" issue only.
|
Wibfision
msg:721349 | 1:33 pm on Mar 4, 2006 (gmt 0) |
BD has taken over the 72.14.207.104 data centre now, which is my google.co.uk.
|
Wibfision
msg:721350 | 1:58 pm on Mar 4, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Ah it's changed back. 72.14.207.104 is switching back and forth between BD and not BD. Anyway, I'm going to get a life and stay away from the computer for a while.
|
UK_Web_Guy
msg:721351 | 7:17 pm on Mar 4, 2006 (gmt 0) |
72.14.207.104 has been pretty solid in serving me BD results all day. I think this is actually quite significant as it is 72.14.207.104 that has been serving my google.co.uk results for 90% of the past few weeks < continued at: [webmasterworld.com...] > [edited by: tedster at 6:53 am (utc) on Mar. 6, 2006]
|
| This 192 message thread spans 7 pages: < < 192 ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] ) |
|
|
