homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.198.33.96
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Press releases
Duplicate content
miedmark




msg:707065
 12:58 am on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

I'm sure this has been discussed many times. When posting a press release on various sites - who gets penaltized (if anyone) for duplicate content. After all, it's same content on site A, site B, site C, etc. Does google not penaltize for duplicate content on different sites?

 

Erku




msg:707066
 2:24 am on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

I would like to learn about this too.

ken_b




msg:707067
 2:41 am on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

This is only a problem if you post the PR verbatim, as opposed to ediring it carefully or using it to write an original piece.

Here's a thread on Editing Press Releases [webmasterworld.com] that you might want to read.

miedmark




msg:707068
 11:46 am on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

ken_b - thank you for the link. It explains a lot how to create or edit press releases (great). Still, nothing about duplicate content. Let's say your release is posted on couple of hundred sites (and most of them are not edited - meaning same content) who gets penaltized?

Marketing Guy




msg:707069
 12:00 pm on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

No one. Duplicate content doesn't get penalised - if anything it will just be ignored.

It doesn't matter in the end - PR on your own site shouldn't be targeting your core terms (you do this using unique pages of content) - if anything PR / articles that are distributed would target your brand term and possibly less competitive key phrases - they will never rank well for competitive terms, be it on your site or a hundred others.

Regardless, what is the objective of your press release? Exposure. It's not going to bring direct traffic and it's likely that inbound links from PR / articles are heavily discounted or even completed ignored. It's the buzz - the exposure that your PR creates that benefits you, both in terms of marketing and in terms of SEO.

MG

bigtoga




msg:707070
 12:09 pm on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Good ideas/thoughts - thanks MG :)

miedmark




msg:707071
 12:54 pm on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Thank you MG. You answered all my questions. Thanks.

texasville




msg:707072
 5:12 pm on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

What happens is your release is picked up by others, posted on their site. Googlebot picks them up and they slowly go into the supplemental index and count for very little. Same as with articles picked up.
I have articles picked up that for a short time provided links. Now, they have all gone supplemental. Any page they are on has pr0. It seems to help in yahoo and msn as backlinks but I think google completely ignores them.

Marketing Guy




msg:707073
 5:19 pm on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

There is PR (PageRank value) from press releases if you can get the story picked up as part of another story - so for example, an industry publication may see your PR and write about it in some way with a link back - those type of articles tend to have a much longer term value.

Eazygoin




msg:707074
 5:23 pm on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Press releases/Article submission have two main purposes. The first is to get exposure for your website, and it can provide this very cheaply, or indeed, for free.
The second is to get links to your website. Generally, press releases are shown on 0 PR pages, so probably doesn't help very much towards page rank.
However, if the press release itself gets listed high in the SERP's, it can create excellent exposure for a website.
Checking my b/l's I notice a considerable amount of press releases and other articles are listed, and are all non-supplemental.
Finally, I write these to get exposure, and not page rank. If that's a secondary benefit, then so be it!

Edit>> Sorry , I forgot to mention the dupe content question. My first ever press release/article was to introduce my site. It is now on hundreds of other websites/blogs, and so far it hasn't been considered duplicate content.

Marketing Guy




msg:707075
 5:31 pm on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Ah if we're broadening the subject, I would also like to point out that there is a tangible value in optimising PR and Articles for brand and brand related terms - it's nice to dominate the SERPs for your brand term! ;)

This can be part of a brand protection exercise or even a damage limitation exercise if you have received bad coverage somewhere that is ranking for your brand terms.

aris1970




msg:707076
 11:51 pm on Dec 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Our main business site republishes press releases for the last 4 years without absolutely any problem.

No duplicate content, no supplemental pages, no penalty.

Generally I think the age of the site and how authority it's considered by Google are the main factors for success.

For many of the press releases, if you search for their title on Google you will see our page rank higher than the corporate original's one.

PS. FYI there are no direct backlinks in the press releases that we republish.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved