| 7:19 pm on Dec 12, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Yes, Google does serve different results to different browsers - and to different locations and who knows what other factors. But I doubt that your clicks alone would have a strong effect. They just wouldn't open themselves up to that kind of easy manipulation.
| 10:27 pm on Dec 12, 2005 (gmt 0)|
|They just wouldn't open themselves up to that kind of easy manipulation. |
But seriously on what basis should the results be so different.
| 10:54 pm on Dec 12, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Were you logged in to google in one browser and not the other?
| 11:05 pm on Dec 12, 2005 (gmt 0)|
No that was my first thought
both are on the same IP. I just use IE on occasion when a webamster can't get it right.
I now use it to see the difference in SERPS.
Its always the same IE has different results to FF
Its even forced me to check if IE has caught a cold. thats why I use FF it gets less colds.
I use MS Beta AntiSpy and Spybot so I haven't had a problem of late.
I can accept small differences but the difference I am seeing is substantial. which makes me wonder why
| 11:15 pm on Dec 12, 2005 (gmt 0)|
A bit of background. mostly out of curiousity
Since jagger a site I promote lost a large amount of ground.
Like many others I assumed that it was because of a link promotion service I was using. so I stopped the service.
I started monitoring serps more closely then. I had previously noted that when I search on IE I get a different result set to FF. so thats what I did.
In FF my position improved to page 2 at one stage but in IE it always stayed low ~8
I expected the results to swap around depending on which google server I hit at the time and ultimately both to align.
But instead the serps stabilised at 4 for FF and 9 for IE
It also means I am better off going back on the link promotion system. I'd prefer it if my serps were higher in IE than in FF.
| 11:20 pm on Dec 12, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Different language setting maybe?
| 12:54 am on Dec 13, 2005 (gmt 0)|
No same language, same IP different browser.
I have only monitored the one site it would be interesting to see if this is an abberation or the norm
but what it does suggest is if you use a SERP monitoring program you really have no idea where you are in the serps.
the results may be quite different for a package that advertises itself as a bot or webposition or whatever....
| 1:06 am on Dec 13, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Clear your cookies in both IE and Firefox.
Now run the tests again.
Now Clear your cookies and change the User Agent on Firefox to match IE exactly. (This is easier in Opera I think. If necessary check your own web logs to get the precise User Agent string).
Now run the tests again.
| 1:13 am on Dec 13, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Using Safari and Camino and the same search term I'm seeing something like two different search engines.
Different sponsored links at the right, sponsored links at the top yes and no, image search results yes and no and different search results. Cookies or no cookies doesn't make a difference.
| 2:07 am on Dec 13, 2005 (gmt 0)|
It absolutely makes sense to have different results on firefox and IE. Google has a lot of information on Surfing behaviour, SERP click tracking, etc. With the IE and firefox toolbars they can monitor click behaviour. The people that use firefox are diferent to IE and thus will have different serp preferences.
| 2:23 am on Dec 13, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Sorry I don't agree
In fact I found the problem...
It was the google toolbar. Once I disabled the toolbar I got similar results in FF to IE.
So what does that mean? ....
| 2:26 am on Dec 13, 2005 (gmt 0)|
my last response was a bit curt.. sorry
Although I do agree on some differences being relavant between the 2 browsers. it would be hard to quantify those differences.
I think that playing that game is trying to be too smart and result in problems.
We know google is too smart to be too smart