| 8:15 pm on Nov 26, 2005 (gmt 0)|
| 8:18 pm on Nov 26, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Not that I've ever heard.
| 8:25 pm on Nov 26, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I see no correlation at all.
I see no advantage of one host over another.
Go back and study your own pages for their (de)merits etc. Hosts ain't it. -Lary
| 8:50 pm on Nov 26, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I've changed hosts, from shared, to virtual dedicated, (two different hosting companies) and witnessed no change in the SERPS whatsoever.
| 9:19 pm on Nov 26, 2005 (gmt 0)|
well....popular host=lots of sites=some dodgy sites=same ip=possible problem by associaton
never experienced this problem that im aware but have heard anecdotally that is can be a problem. Assuming shared ip or block of course.
| 9:37 pm on Nov 26, 2005 (gmt 0)|
yes - if the Google search patent is/will be implented
| 9:54 pm on Nov 26, 2005 (gmt 0)|
which bit of the patent are you referring to ..
( unless of course you are confusing this with google as domain seller and google as hoster ..soon to be announced service )..
followed by google as pool boy and google dating ..:)
| 10:00 pm on Nov 26, 2005 (gmt 0)|
If you search for "google patent" in G there are plenty of articles that describe what they plan to do, including the hosting aspect.