Gimp
msg:719631 | 2:10 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Folks, it is all meaningless. Until things stablize and until they are done tweaking and testing, this is all just mental masturbation. Sit back, watch and have another cup of coffee. The more coffee the better. It will wind your nerves up so you will really get excited when this stabilizes and the fat man sings.
|
Block19Row13
msg:719632 | 2:16 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
lee_sufc is that sunderland or the blades?
|
Dayo_UK
msg:719633 | 2:21 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Or Southend? Hmmz - Sunderland - U? I am trying to watch logs rather than DCs at the moment to see if anything significant for my sites - not much :(
|
lee_sufc
msg:719634 | 2:21 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
neither - southend, lol
|
lee_sufc
msg:719635 | 2:22 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
dayo - spot on
|
Dayo_UK
msg:719636 | 2:22 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
;) - He he - just got in there.
|
Block19Row13
msg:719637 | 2:22 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
block19row13 is my seat at arsenal. been to roots hall once years ago, 1 - 1 against watford. TBH im just greatfull we are showing in the SERPS again!
|
marketingmagic
msg:719638 | 2:33 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Seeing index pages that were ranking well yesterday now gone and sub pages ranking (albeit not as well).
|
Miop
msg:719639 | 3:00 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
> Can anyone explain why I get consistent results and great listings for our site when I check individual ip addresses for the datacentres, but when i check google.co.uk I get completly different results? > My top ten kw's in the uk are nowhere to be seen on the .com site or even the not uk only on the uk site.
|
Pico_Train
msg:719640 | 3:04 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Thierry Henry!
Thierry Henry!
|
reseller
msg:719641 | 3:34 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Hi Folks Please repeat after me: FLUX....FLUX...FLUX No need to watch DCs at present. Not much gonna stay as it is now :-) And once again: FLUX....FLUX...FLUX No need to watch DCs at present. Not much gonna stay as it is now :-) Thanks.
|
StriderUK
msg:719642 | 3:46 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
>>I am trying to watch logs rather than DCs at the moment to see if anything significant for my sites - not much<< Dayo_UK is right - I hope to see the first indication for any fluxing about in my logs.
|
annej
msg:719643 | 4:17 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Interesting, no new posts from GG and no entries in MCs blog for several days. Things seem to be on hold for some reason.
|
needinfo
msg:719644 | 4:34 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
annej,
I was just thinking the same myself. It would be nice to get some kind of update from eitehr of them.
|
Block19Row13
msg:719645 | 4:34 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
sorry if this is a dumb question, but what does Flux actually mean?
|
taps
msg:719646 | 4:37 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
reseller stated in some of his posts before that Matt took a week off(line). I think GG and Matt can only tell us what we see: Jagger 3 finally has spreaded over all DCs but there's still some flux to be done. Maybe GG is busy speeding up the flux. Come on GG! Faster - I want all of my visitors back, not just a few.
|
bekyed
msg:719647 | 4:47 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Block19Row13 Fluctuating search engine results pages from different data centres. Bek.
|
Block19Row13
msg:719648 | 4:50 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
in other words, what comes back up, can go plunging back down again?
|
outland88
msg:719649 | 5:00 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
>Interesting, no new posts from GG and no entries in MCs blog for several days. Things seem to be on hold for some reason.< Geez, fellows lets be realistic. Many of these fellows are millionaires. It’s off for Thanksgiving and Christmas parties for the rest of the year. They probably even got bonuses and added time off for the spam reports you sent in.
|
taps
msg:719650 | 5:02 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
flux: yes it can go down again. Some new pages show up, some others vanish... Some pages make their way back to former positions. Normally the flux will settle after an update and results will become more stable. If you're up in the serps now you can be optimistic. At least I am :-) After flux is done this will turn into everflux. ("Everflux" is a trademark of flux-guru reseller.)
|
Dayo_UK
msg:719651 | 5:06 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
I still have a slight problem with saying that Jagger3 is on all DCs. Yes, there are certain things that started on 66.102.9.104 that have now made it to all DCs. But there are also certain things that are still shown only on 66.102.9.104 and a handfull of DCs. But - this update surely cant still be going? - So perhaps it is just flux :P ;)
|
reseller
msg:719652 | 5:33 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Dayo_UK >>But - this update surely cant still be going? Of course it can still go on and on. Thats why Brett has chosen a new name for it; UPDATE SAGA :-)
|
Miop
msg:719653 | 5:54 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Just what I thought it was almost all over.. I am getting a backlink udate (less - eek!) on these DC's.
64.233.171.99
64.233.171.104
64.233.171.105
64.233.171.147 I reckon Jagger 3 is only half done, let alone rolled out.
Still wish they could have done it in january - our traffic is rubbish and our sales are even worse.
|
Unca_Tim
msg:719654 | 6:00 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Flux means one day your customers can find you, and the next day they cant....
|
dfre
msg:719655 | 6:04 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| Flux means one day your customers can find you, and the next day they cant.... |
|
OR one day your customers can find you, then next day they are someone else's customers. ;-)
|
pteam
msg:719656 | 6:45 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Some people are seeing a pr update as of this morning. Where o where has Matt cutts been? His blog has mysteriously been left at Pubcon notes part 1 for a long time now.
|
frup
msg:719657 | 6:50 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
We have been told time and time again, backlink updates mean nothing. I wish people would just listen to what Matt Cutts tells us.
|
Miop
msg:719658 | 6:59 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
< We have been told time and time again, backlink updates mean nothing.> Not even that they are having an update? :) < I wish people would just listen to what Matt Cutts tells us. > Ah I missed what Matt Cutts tells us about backlinks.
I presumed they were worth something.
|
zikos
msg:719659 | 7:05 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
64.233.171.99
64.233.171.104
64.233.171.105
64.233.171.147
confirmed back link update.
Welcome to update SAGA
(I hope not any Lord of the rings saga or Harry Potter saga)
What I have noticed though is that those DC's showing the back links i had before the latest BL update ,does anybody else noticed that?
|
WebPixie
msg:719660 | 7:13 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Yea, I'm seeing backlink count the same as before the most recent backlink update on those DCs.
|
Dayo_UK
msg:719661 | 7:14 pm on Nov 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
It looks just like a temp rollback on a couple of DCs of PR and BL - not a big deal. Happens sometimes - especially during update time. If anyone is seeing a whole new PR and BL figures - then please correct me if I am wrong.
|
|
