homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.224.202.109
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

This 318 message thread spans 11 pages: < < 318 ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 > >     
Matt Cutts on the Google Sandbox
Secrets of the sandbox revealed at Pubcon?
rogerd




msg:721524
 10:45 pm on Nov 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

The existence of a new-site "sandbox" (which delays the site being ranked well for months) has been a topic of debate among SEOs.

In reply to a question from Brett Tabke, Matt said that there wasn't a sandbox, but the algorithm might affect some sites, under some circumstances, in a way that a webmaster would perceive as being sandboxed.

So, for some sites, in effect there IS a sandbox.

 

energylevel




msg:721794
 2:51 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Not so sure ... I've seen new sites paying for Adwords for a long time and NOT escaping the sandbox

Sparkys_Dad




msg:721795
 3:04 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Perhaps it is as simple as: don't submit the site to Google--instead open an AdWords account.

mixer28




msg:721796
 3:53 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

DAVE - just to clarify -

Is your point that if you build up site populairty through traffic from places other than Google - Google itself is likely to treat the site more favourably?

Or maybe we should try blocking out Yahoo and MSN crawlers in robots.txt? Give Google exclusive access to our top notch content and not their competition - Matt Cutts might like that idea :-)

DaveN




msg:721797
 3:57 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Blocking out Yahoo ... Lol No i'm blocking yahoo becasue i have other sites ranking for the keywords.. didn't want to be greedy and all that :)

DaveN

rstein68




msg:721798
 4:14 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Matt used Hurricane Katrina relief sites as an example of sites that cropped up that did not get "sandboxed" even though they were new. It made me think that if you signup for adwords AND put adsense on your new site you have a better chance of getting traffic, getting noticed by google and staying unsandboxed.

mixer28




msg:721799
 5:15 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Dave - the unusual thing about your site logs is that 'no referrer' is the biggest number.

A stable site would ideally be able to survive without relying solely on natural traffic from Google.

Relying on Google for 'free traffic' and not having other options would be a volatile business model.

With your site having so many no refer visitors it looks very stable.

So how is it done?

All I can think of is that for a new site writing lots of articles, press releases, some ppc, occasional banner/text ads and email marketing would be ways of generating traffic activity on a new site without search engines. So if site popularity of sorts means preferential treatment from Google this kind of approach could help.

I'm I getting close to the answer Dave?

[edited by: mixer28 at 5:20 pm (utc) on Nov. 24, 2005]

DaveN




msg:721800
 5:18 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

'no referrer' means i get booked marked :)

DaveN

keno




msg:721801
 7:30 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

>> 'no referrer' means i get booked marked

“Click here for more free stuff” :-)

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Maybe = [toolbar.google.com...]

From what I can tell Adwords does not show up as "Adwords" in the referal logs. It shows up as "Google", and I would think Google knows it is PPC and not organic.

Froogle does show on the referal logs though, and is where I get most of my Google free traffic from, but it's not alot...just a thought/guess.

DaveN




msg:721802
 7:31 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

i don't do PPC

WallyBob




msg:721803
 7:43 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Energylevel - You're right buying traffic through adwords doesn't help you get listed in google.

DaveN - sorry to hear about your grandmum. Losing someone is always hard.

kwngian




msg:721804
 7:43 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

It made me think that if you signup for adwords AND put adsense on your new site you have a better chance of getting traffic, getting noticed by google and staying unsandboxed.

I am experiencing the exact opposite of this.

energylevel




msg:721805
 8:01 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Signing up for adwords definately doesn't help in my experience.....

keno




msg:721806
 8:06 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

>>Signing up for adwords definately doesn't help in my experience.....

Wish I had thought of that 3 months ago when I launched one of my sites. But they had me in a box, so to speak... :-)

energylevel




msg:721807
 8:06 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

It needs to be a signal of quality for Google, I don't think Adsense or paying for Adwords is such an indication, good quality relevant inbound links that Google can't trace as bought for search engine gain like paid web directory links might the way to go ....

walkman




msg:721808
 9:41 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

>> Matt used Hurricane Katrina relief sites as an example of sites that cropped up that did not get "sandboxed" even though they were new.

not a good argument--unless he can show us that all of them managed to escape it. Not all new sites can get links from the Red Cross, CNN, MSNBC or Fema.

activeco




msg:721809
 9:48 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Not all new sites can get links from the Red Cross, CNN, MSNBC or Fema.

True Walkman.
So they don't deserve the top from the very beginning.

energylevel




msg:721810
 9:51 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

steveb ... are you sniffing something?

Are you a moderator, you're acting as though you are one?

energylevel




msg:721811
 10:02 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

<<< not a good argument--unless he can show us that all of them managed to escape it. Not all new sites can get links from the Red Cross, CNN, MSNBC or Fema. >>>

I was thinking the exact same thing, it can be very difficult to acquire these types of inbound links, maybe if you already own one or more authority sites in a particular sector you can swing it for your new site by linking from you authority site(s), that's a rare case scenario though ...

activeco




msg:721812
 10:13 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

maybe if you already own one or more authority sites in a particular sector you can swing it for your new site by linking from you authority site(s), that's a rare case scenario though..

Not exactly. That's the one of the main points of Sandbox believers: New site linked by an "authority" site, having good PR, but still - nowhere to be found.
It seems there are super-authority sites whose links are beyond questioning.
Unfortunately for many, DMOZ is not (anymore) one of them.

energylevel




msg:721813
 10:35 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

<<< It seems there are super-authority sites whose links are beyond questioning. >>>

That means most of us might as well resign our new sites to being sandboxed unless there supersites are like Yahoo Directory where you can buy yourself in ...

activeco




msg:721814
 10:38 pm on Nov 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

I don't think Y directory is in it either.

What many have been missing is that success and "authority" usually comes gradually.
You are not supposed to be a king merely by being born.

coburn




msg:721815
 12:15 am on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

Dave - brushing the London icycles off the toe-nails, your post has pulled me into this good guessing game!

Guess: you're writing quality copy or offering a valued resource for free and know how to publicise it?

So could 4,5,10 perhaps be your path into the SE's?
If so, then are they:
A. News (like bbc)
B. Specialist subject
C. public relations (prweb/slashdot)
D. Authority sites Owned by you

If I'm too close to the bone, pls sticky.

dougs




msg:721816
 2:06 am on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

Oh come on DaveN writing good copy, which planet you on.

DougS:)

BillyS




msg:721817
 3:28 am on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

This is an interesting one. Sorry to hear about your grandmother I lost mine earlier this year (back in April), she was 94.

Anyway, as long as everyone is guessing, what DaveN is telling me is this:

Don't try to get links, that's a SEO tactic. He's saying, try to get traffic by having some kind of high-traffic site point to your site.

- He also said it was an ecommerce site, that rules out things like content publisher (article mills).

- He doesn't do ppc (I agree, Adwords doesn't help)

So that really makes me think like a marketer. So that means:

1 - Put up an advertisement on a website that has high standards for their advertisers. Could be a text link on a high quality / well known website.

2 - Put out a press release of some sort that gets you noticed.

aeiouy




msg:721818
 4:35 am on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

DaveN,

Sorry to hear about your grandmother. I don't know if you are still up for the guessing games, but I will throw a few questions out there.

Is it via some sort of high-yield traffic generation from places similar to /. or digg?

If not, are you having directly pay for the traffic you are receiving from these mystery links?

midwestguy




msg:721819
 4:38 am on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

Hi DaveN,

Just wanted to offer you my condolences on the passing away of your Grandparent. I know how much a Grandparent can mean to a person (indeed even the whole family)...and how big a hole they can leave for everyone in the family when they pass away.

FWIW, remembering back to such a time in my own family, it seems the best "ointment" for one's own heart was the love, compassion and just "being there" support -- and time -- shared and given to fellow family members who were similarly affected.

Again my condolences on your loss to you and your family.

Best wishes (and comfort) to you and yours in all regards,

Louis

billk89




msg:721820
 5:51 am on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

1000000's of newsgroups or would that be spam?

McMohan




msg:721821
 6:22 am on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

Dave, my condolences are with you too. I had written a biography of my grandma with tears in my eyes all night after I heard the news. I was away on studies then.

I don't think I can add much to what midwestguy has written. Touching.

dfud




msg:721822
 6:01 pm on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

I apologize for the off-topic detour.

My Grandma passed away about 10 years ago. My Grandpa (her husband) passed about 20 years ago, my other Grandpa about 5 years ago.

I think of these people every day. It's amazing now to look back and realize the amount of impact they had on my life. So much more than I ever realized at the time.

If there is anyone out there that hasn't visited with their Grandparents for a while, I suggest you grab the phone, the car, or the plane - and get it done.

The only real regret I have in life is that I didn't spend more time with my elder relatives before they passed away.

I apologize for the off-topic detour.

Rynert




msg:721823
 6:22 pm on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

"Stop thinking like an SEO"

Create a great site. Sell an in demand product. Advertise offline (and some high profile online). Use permission marketing on the site. Visit every day/week for 5 days/weeks get a discount voucher sort of thing.

People have to keep coming back to that great site to get that great price for that great product. Throw in some 'tell your friends get bigger discount' type offers and you are sailing.

Rollo




msg:721824
 6:47 pm on Nov 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

they have nothing to lose by saying it exists so why do they keep saying it doesn't.

I think they would have something to lose by admiting it which is why they don't. If Google admits publically that new sites (however great the content) don't rank well for up to 6 months or even a year, other engines, especially MSN can market theirs as the most up-to-date SERPs. Search is 50% buzz and Google could tarnish its reputation.

The existance of the sandbox makes perfect sense and is a major deterent for spam, but Google, however much they try, shouldn't be allowed to have it both ways... boast SERPs with less outright spam vis-a-vis other engines (for which the sandbox is a major aid) while also pretending that the sandbox doesn't exist and that their SERPs are are as up-to-date as the others (which they are not). For new sites, MSN ranks them far earlier than the others (but also pays a price for doing so).

This 318 message thread spans 11 pages: < < 318 ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 > >
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved