homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.111.111
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Dealing with Reciprocal Linking
how to counteract penalties
ionchannels




msg:765707
 4:14 pm on Nov 7, 2005 (gmt 0)

Hi,
As a service to those who link to me, I wrote a script to automatically detect incoming referrals, filter out the spam and display a normal a href link to the referring sites (top 10 from a rolling 30 day average). I have lost 5-10 spots on my most important keywords from Jagger3 and I was wondering if reciprocal links could be the cause.

If I were to change the outgoing links to go to a redirect script or add rel=nofollow to the tag, would this cause google to no longer consider it a reciprocal link? I am also considering removing this feature altogether, but I would rather keep it. Any advice?
Thanks...

 

watercrazed




msg:765708
 7:59 am on Nov 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

I would not use the nofollow, I looked into doing it and determined that it would be effective now, but it is not what it was intended for and might incure a penalty on the next update unless google saw it as user contributed content.

Make sure your script is making the link page/s tightly themed and related to your site.

I personally believe that recip links are still valuable but maybe not as much as before, - that might account for a small drop but not a plunge, ie into the 100+ results range.

ownerrim




msg:765709
 4:31 pm on Nov 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

"...but it is not what it was intended for and might incure a penalty on the next update unless google saw it as user contributed content."

Where do we always get this penalty conspiracy stuff? What penalty? How can google possibly get into the mind of a webmaster to determine why he or she did or did not use "no follow". I really doubt they have the desire or personnel to waste on evaluating the motives of any webmaster who uses this attribute.

stubear




msg:765710
 10:37 pm on Nov 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

"I wrote a script to ... filter out the spam and display a normal a href link"

Hey, you should work for google ;)

neuron




msg:765711
 10:42 pm on Nov 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

I have lost 5-10 spots on my most important keywords from Jagger3 and I was wondering if reciprocal links could be the cause.

not likely

my main sites are all powered by reciprocal links, ahem, quality reciprocal links, likely on a scale, from what it sounds, an order of magnitude or two more than yours. Jagger kicked them all down, but now they're back. #1 and #2 for the main two keyterms.

Unscathed through another update, and I just sat and didn't change a thing.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved