homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.34.105
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Why did Google introduce PageRank to the public?
Heywood_J

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 31884 posted 5:38 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

For years now, we have all stressed or rejoiced everytime there's a PR update. And it's been a great gauge of relevant sites over the years, but I wonder, what was the real benefit to google by releasing PageRank to the world? Are they really better off? They were holding all of the cards, yet they decide to show part of their hand. And we all know the can of worms they opened with that decision. Google has always guarded their secrets like it's fort knox and they have always prided themselve with keeping webmasters (and the competition) guessing on their algo. Do you think google regrets their decision to release PageRank?

 

Stefan

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 31884 posted 10:16 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

I don't know, it seems to me that PageRank was part of the marketing, not just an in-house factor in the algo - it had to be public. Agreed, for sure, that they created a monster in the process - it's been a real factor in the difficulty of getting decent search results in all the SE's. Adsense polluted the content, PR polluted the links.

dmorison

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 31884 posted 10:32 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Google as a commercial entity didn't, PageRank was the result of a Stanford University research project...

[www-db.stanford.edu...]

However, even if this was not the case, i'm pretty sure that link popularity as the basis of Google's operation would have been reverse engineered in principle very quickly.

edit: or did you just mean releasing the actual PR value of pages.... :D

Heywood_J

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 31884 posted 10:23 pm on Nov 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

I am simply amazed by the time webmasters are devoting to this. PageRank has taking on a life of it's own and many have taken their eye off the ball because of it.

kevinpate

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 31884 posted 10:33 pm on Nov 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

Whatever else it was, wasn't, coulda, woulda, or shoulda been, it was, and remains today, a brillant bit of inexpensive marketing.

designhaus

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 31884 posted 9:11 am on Nov 7, 2005 (gmt 0)

Pagerank does not work and and has never worked. Google have been to embarressed to admit it from the start. It would have been a public relations disaster if the admitted that the algo did not work properly.

Consider Pagerank a mistake on Googles part that they have never addressed due to possible public relations issues.

johan

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 31884 posted 10:19 am on Nov 7, 2005 (gmt 0)

designhaus tell us what does work?

My car is fairly reliable and only broke down twice in 8 years so your telling me my car doesn’t work? Then what car does work 100% of the time?

Page rank is fairly reliable and there is only a minority abusing it and buying it. Btw Google is also the number one SE.

If you buy Page Rank your site will have more page rank but will you rank better than other sites with the same page rank or slightly less, the answer is no.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved