homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.123.2
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

This 930 message thread spans 31 pages: < < 930 ( 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 31 > >     
Update Jagger, Google Update Oct 18th, 2005
When can we expect a new PR update?
jretzer




msg:815226
 5:33 pm on Oct 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

Continued from here:
[webmasterworld.com...]



Anyone have any guesses as to when we can expect a new systemwide PR update?

 

GoogleGuy




msg:815736
 8:55 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

followgreg, I would take this opportunity to report spam that you see; it's a really good time to get the report in front of someone who can act on it.

walkman, I'd say the same about the PR7 spam site you mentioned.

Dayo_UK




msg:815737
 8:57 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

>>>Dealing with ranking issues e.g. canonicalization would be very exciting for you, I guess ;-)

Lol - not just me - it goes deep - just posted on MC blog about the update thread at SEW - it appears every domain mentioned in that thread has Canonical url problems (non-www and www etc).

steveb




msg:815738
 8:57 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

"What I really cannot understand is why they have gone so over board with the penalties they hand out."

They certainly have done no such thing, imo. The opposite in fact. A lot of sites that likely had penalties against them seem to have been, wrongly, looked upon too favorably by this update. Google needs to get far more aggressive with its penalties. One month slaps on the wrist aren't even worth mentioning.

Google has made tons of screwups and lost a lot of sites. It's ludicrous to call these "penalties" though. When you drop a glass on the floor, you did not penalize it.

GoogleGuy




msg:815739
 9:00 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

By the way, texasville: your spam report was textbook. Under 100 words, four domains mentioned. You gave a query to demonstrate the problem (not just a url), a clear description of the blackhat spam technique (doorway pages with sneaky JavaScript redirects), and the background on the SEO. I took care of it myself just now. The sites should be gone in a day or so. The client site with doorway pages can apply for reinclusion once the doorway pages are gone, but since you gave me two examples of what the SEO did (and the SEO left such clear evidence), I don't expect that SEO to come back anytime soon.

Nice. :) We got to take action on it, and we're also looking at priorities going forward.

DanUKSW




msg:815740
 9:03 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

After checking my site's position on Google I was wondering why it is that I see different serps depending on whether I use BT as my ISP or Freeserve (I'm in the UK BTW)?

Dan

reseller




msg:815741
 9:06 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

steveb

>>When you drop a glass on the floor, you did not penalize it. <<

Honestly steveb. Aren't you excited to see what will happen to those gorgeous supplemetals of yours after Jagger3 shows up? :-)

[edited by: reseller at 9:07 am (utc) on Oct. 27, 2005]

McMohan




msg:815742
 9:06 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

GG, nice of you to review spam reports yourself. Hope spam reports I sent will get your eyeballs too :)

Isn't it surprising while Google is preparing to handle sophisticated spam techniques and overt SEOing, G is still not able to address few of the primitive, old school spamming such as hidden text and links?

[edited by: McMohan at 9:10 am (utc) on Oct. 27, 2005]

eyezshine




msg:815743
 9:06 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

I believe alot of sites are being dropped because some sites have lost some backlinks.

According to googles patent I read, good sites will continue getting natural links pointing at their site. Which causes your rankings to go up.

If a good site goes bad, the natural back links will stop or slow down causing your rankings to drop. Or causing a penalty?

If you had a few websites that were hevily cross linked you would be fine until you took those cross links off of your pages. Which would cause a penalty because you had a massive drop in links to your websites.

Or if you traded links hevily for a month with a couple hundred sites and then did nothing for a few months. Your link growth stopped and you would get a penalty.

I also read that they keep track of your link (growth and decline) every month.

So if you traded links alot for a month and then stopped it would look bad because your rate of link growth was real high for a month and then dropped down to normal which looks like below normal to google because of the one month you traded links heavily.

Google is looking for sites that grow steadily over time. If you get 100 links this month, you should also get 100 links next month and every month after that. That will keep you from getting a penalty.

The whole idea behind that is to fight buying links. Or buying page rank.

The sandbox is there to keep a person from buying a PR7 link and ranking right away. Basically making you run out of money from buying page rank.

Keeping track of your link growth history helps them rank you according to how popular your site is right now.

If your site steadily recieves new backlinks every month you will steadily rank well in google. If your site suddenly goes bad then people will drop your link and google will lower your ranking.

Or if you bought links on high PR pages and you dropped those links after a month or 2 or 3 you would get a penalty because you lost those links.

I have 18 websites and I have been testing google and how it ranks sites for over 5 years and this is how things are working from what I have seen in my own websites.

Google is right about "There is allmost nothing your competetor can do to get you banned".

But there is one thing I have found that works to get a competetor banned but I don't think that sort of thing needs to be let out of the bag.

zeus




msg:815744
 9:14 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

About reporting spam, most of those reports are to uptimize there filter, thats also the best way, because they can not sit and delete site the whole day, of cause a few will be deleted at once.

Reseller and Dayo - About the update, your and maybe my site troubles (my troubles 302/hijacking/non www) is first seeing a effect late this weekend or next week, so there is still hope, but once again dont expect to much, they had a year to fix it and nothing, but of cause we can hope for the best + its also the first time we have got a real statment from google, so we will maybe have a great Christmas.

Strider




msg:815745
 9:15 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Googleguy sorry I must have missed it - is [66.102.9.104...] fully set already and is going to propagate onto other DC's in next few days?

if so is there a way to get a confirmation from you that a certain site got hit for a certain keyword (passed undamaged thru all previous updates including Florida but jagger2 seemed to have killed me).

is there a way to post you a question?

GoogleGuy




msg:815746
 9:18 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

DanUKSW, you're probably hitting different data centers. The folks here can coach you about which ones are which, but 66.102.9.104 shows the directions that things are moving.

GoogleGuy




msg:815747
 9:19 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Strider, you're best bet is to use the dissatisfied link, the keyword jagger2, and then mention your nick (strider) and also call out for GoogleGuy.

Dayo_UK




msg:815748
 9:21 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Yes Zeus

But we know now that Google are serious about it and hopefully serious about a fix. So I assume that if the fix is not right they will want feedback etc until they do get it right.

At the moment each update more and more sites get caught out (so it seems to me) - it is not just me being selfish (obv. I want my sites to return) - but going forward Google need to make sure they get this right.

IMO etc - however, we should probably talk about it this time next week or a bit later.

McMohan




msg:815749
 9:22 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

DanUKSW
After checking my site's position on Google I was wondering why it is that I see different serps depending on whether I use BT as my ISP or Freeserve

Ranks will depend on which DC your default Google is resolving to. I would suggest you search on 66.102.9.104, since those results are the new batch of ranks.

[added - OK, posted before I saw GG's post]

reseller




msg:815750
 9:25 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

cleanup

>>I have come to learn that the first changes in an update are usually the important ones and the flux that comes afterwards is just a little tweak here and there. Jagger seams is no different from the rest so far. <<

I beg to differ. IMO, all parts of an updates are important. Allegra and Borboun are good examples. And then the "flux" which I still fear most ;-)

And fellow members who have been affected by Jagger1 would tell another story than yours, I Guess ;-)

GoogleGuy




msg:815751
 9:26 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

McMohan, saw two from you. Both were valid and will be acted on.

But tonight, I'm going to sleep. :)

asher02




msg:815752
 9:26 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Question for GoogleGuy,

I really appreciate Google effort to fight spam!
But what about all legitimate site that got caught in the cross fire?
Is there any way to contact Google about it?

GoogleGuy




msg:815753
 9:27 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Goodnight everybody.. :)

Dayo_UK




msg:815754
 9:29 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Cleanup/Reseller

Back in the old days - then I would agree - serps appeared on a dc and these pretty much were what you got.

Dominic and Esmerelda were the first times I think that things really seemed to be different.

(although with this update MC did sort of indicate on his blog that these were three seperate updates that are happening at the same time so could be thought of as one)

Night GG - this going to become a regular late night thing to send you to sleep :)

[edited by: Dayo_UK at 9:30 am (utc) on Oct. 27, 2005]

reseller




msg:815755
 9:30 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

GoogleGuy

Thanks for paying so much attention and taking care of fellow members spam reports. Very encouraging indeed. Much appreciated.

And of course a BIG THANK YOU also goes to the other friends at Google WebSpam Team.

McMohan




msg:815756
 9:32 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Good night GG, questions to you will never end :)

asher02
But what about all legitimate site that got caught in the cross fire?

Suggest you wait until Jagger3 rolls out. I guess it was Dayo who told, "report what is there but shouldn't be, not what is not there but should be"

followgreg




msg:815757
 9:41 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)


Googleguy,

Sure, I will report this blackhat/spamer again with jagger2 as info.

Trust me when I say that I am talking about probably the biggest "cloaking pages" farm out there, but it will hurt also all their clients so I though that you guys did not want to penalize for this reason...
I going to report it right now, once again, I will add "referencement" as info if this can help.

Strider




msg:815758
 9:46 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Googleguy I sent you a report reg. my site - thanks for the cue!

God I just can't imagine why I am out of SERPs for the keyword I survived all the major updates (including Florida) with...

DanUKSW




msg:815759
 9:46 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Thanks GoogleGuy and goodnight.

If 66.102.9.104 is indeed the way things are going then things aren't looking too good for me, lol!

I have a related question though. Google has spidered all of my PHP pages as indicated by a site:www.domain.com search, yet my robots.txt has had Disallow: /*.php$ in it for months. I'm a bit concerened as it's also spidered my php converted to html pages, which it must see as duplicate content. Using the datacentre GG suggested I notice that although are pages are still indexed, we've dropped majorly from some key search terms. If this is as a result of the duplicate pages, what is the best way of remedying the situation if I've already taken steps to stop my php pages being crawled?

Thanks for any advice

Dan

marin




msg:815760
 9:48 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

<But what about all legitimate site that got caught in the cross fire? >

I think the main google's goal is not to let you be bored.
After florida I lost the index for two month, but all the inner pages were untouched.
After jagger I see the opposite..my index is still top ranked but I lost all the inner pages.
When google was wrong? : the last 5 years when all my inner pages was top ranked or after jagger when no inner pages can be found?

Spanish_eye




msg:815761
 10:31 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Since this update I think I've probably spent just 1 hour actually doing any proper work. I am spending all my time trying to figure out what has gone wrong and reading more SEO forums that I ever knew existed.

I see Google has lots of job vacancies. Well, if you can't beat them...join them! GoogleGuy, can I send you my CV?

followgreg




msg:815762
 10:58 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Edit: sorry server is slow, I made a dupe post ....I promise not even a joke related to dupe content stuff lol

[edited by: followgreg at 11:00 am (utc) on Oct. 27, 2005]

followgreg




msg:815763
 10:58 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)


Just my 2 cents, I think that Jagger2 (if 66.102.9.104 are close to future results) look nuch better than jagger1 still a few website that were gone in June or ealier are still back there and are not very relevant.
With Jagger1 I could not find my oww favority sites, now I can!

I still think that June results were better...buying season or not.

Eazygoin




msg:815764
 11:27 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Quick question : IP 66.102.7.104 is for Google.com.
Is there an IP address to check changes for Google UK?
Thanks :-)))

Dayo_UK




msg:815765
 11:30 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Eazygoin

Google.co.uk is just one of the dcs - with a bit of UK biased.

Ping google.co.uk to see which DC.

Currently 216.239.59.104 for me - yours might be different though.

DanUKSW




msg:815766
 11:30 am on Oct 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

I've been using this format which seems to work for UK listings although I may be completely wrong!

[66.102.9.104...]

Dan

This 930 message thread spans 31 pages: < < 930 ( 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 31 > >
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved