homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 50.16.36.153
register, login, search, subscribe, help, library, PubCon, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor
Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library : Charter : Moderators: Robert Charlton & andy langton & goodroi & tedster

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Google, the generous tyrant
The way Google acts in general resembles tyranny
alexmart




msg:731396		 11:51 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

Why I am saying he is acting like a tyran?

1. Why not let webmasters opt-in for inclusion in the SE results?

2. Why does it take all your Adsense money if they can detect wich clicks are fraud?

3. Why not ask the publishers for persmission regarding Google Print?

I think the list is bigger but these came to my mind

Google is generous because, most of the time, he uses this power and control wisely. But this is not an excuse.

This is my overview of Google. I am just a newbie but seeing how many things G can do very well, I ask myself why not fix them?. That leaves one option : they don't want to. Why? PLease express opinions

 

tedster




msg:731397		 12:10 am on Oct 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

There's another possible reason -- fixing them may well be a major challenge. It could create more problems than it solves.
europeforvisitors




msg:731398		 1:03 am on Oct 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

1. Why not let webmasters opt-in for inclusion in the SE results?

Because a search engine's job is to index publicly accessible pages on the World Wide Web. (It isn't Google's fault if some people don't understand the difference between the Internet and an intranet.)

2. Why does it take all your Adsense money if they can detect wich clicks are fraud?

Because the threat of punishment is the only way to keep some people honest.

3. Why not ask the publishers for persmission regarding Google Print?

Because Google's copyright lawyers believed that the Google Print scheme was "fair use" (as it may well be; it's a bit early to be second-guessing the courts).

hyperkik




msg:731399		 2:42 am on Oct 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

it's a bit early to be second-guessing the courts

At this point, it might be better deemed "guessing" or "first-guessing"... "predicting"? - unless I missed a court ruling.
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
WebmasterWorld ® and PubCon ® are a Registered Trademarks of Pubcon Inc.
© Pubcon Inc. 1996-2012 all rights reserved