amznVibe
msg:775145 | 6:41 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Supposedly any hour now, this is going to go live
[blogsearch.google.com...] The FAQ is currently available:
[google.com...] We'll see how well they do against blog spammers... (and spam bloggers!)
|
vitaplease
msg:775146 | 7:12 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
nice find looks like it is live now.
|
reseller
msg:775147 | 8:18 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Very nice addition to Google´s search arsenal!
|
mhhfive
msg:775148 | 8:53 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Hmm. no ads in it. Even Technorati has google ads... weird.
|
amznVibe
msg:775149 | 10:25 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Wow it looks like old-school classic google layout.
I kinda miss that style! Whats with the huge spaces between each result? Very beta...
|
pmkpmk
msg:775150 | 10:28 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Huge spaces? One single line is all I see between.
|
amznVibe
msg:775151 | 10:29 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Might be a firefox issue? What browser you using?
|
pmkpmk
msg:775152 | 10:31 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Firefox 1.6
|
amznVibe
msg:775153 | 11:36 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Oh I guess it's my google-preview extension goofing up.
I am sure the author will release a fix shortly...
|
Iguana
msg:775154 | 11:39 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Strange, I'm getting a different URL in the Page title to the green expanded URL below the snippet
|
brokenbricks
msg:775155 | 12:45 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Hope this catches on, I'm #1 and all over the serps for my topic.. Explains why google has been pounding my rss feeds, which show up as 'unrecognized format' in a regular google search
|
TomWaits
msg:775156 | 1:12 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
In our industry, the Google Blog search results are nonsensical. Technorati & Blogdigger destroy these results.
|
Cheeser
msg:775157 | 1:27 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| In our industry, the Google Blog search results are nonsensical. Technorati & Blogdigger destroy these results. |
|
I agree completely. The FAQ suggests searching for Harry Potter reviews and several of the top 10 results for "harry potter" are sexually explicit (let alone it doesn't include any of the top Harry Potter fan sites - all of which have RSS feeds).
|
pmkpmk
msg:775158 | 2:26 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| Hope this catches on, I'm #1 and all over the serps for my topic.. |
|
Same here. However it needs education from the side of the searchers.
|
richardb
msg:775159 | 5:43 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
They could get a hat trick if the did a RSS feed search!
|
michael heraghty
msg:775160 | 6:04 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Does this mean that blog entries will eventually be removed from, or given lower weighting in, the main index? Hmmm...
|
CraigMyers
msg:775161 | 6:28 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Are we taking bets on how long it takes them to put in the adds? Craig
|
Cheeser
msg:775162 | 7:21 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
I'm sorry, but this [google.com] is complete and utter spam. Can anyone provide an example of good results?
|
jamsy
msg:775163 | 7:49 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| I'm sorry, but this is complete and utter spam |
|
Ouch! I wouldn't want to own that site for much longer with all the spammy and adsense tricks on!
|
abates
msg:775164 | 10:31 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0) |
hmm, site: doesn't appear to work, but searching for the full name of my weblog gets near enough. :) Have I mentioned how much I hate the term "blog"? Reminds me of a slang term for a toilet. Edit: Ah, it's "blogurl:" instead! :)
|
shail2005
msg:775165 | 12:04 pm on Sep 15, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Hi all
There was a time when Google used to punish Bloggers
for their spamming . But what the current Scene is?
Any one have some idea about the Google's current reaction , to these bloggers
or how google will restrict Spammer in future ,to take entry through BLOGS?
|
rjohara
msg:775166 | 8:08 am on Sep 17, 2005 (gmt 0) |
An earlier WebmasterWorld prophecy [webmasterworld.com] fulfilled! ;-)
|
bnhall
msg:775167 | 1:57 pm on Sep 23, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Why no ads on blogsearch?
|
|
