homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

Hidden Div Tag
Is this a safe way to display product content?

10+ Year Member

Msg#: 31197 posted 12:50 am on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0)

I have a site with 5000 products. On our product detail pages, we offer paragraph descriptions of the product, and we also show user reviews.

In situations where product despription content exceeds 3 paragraphs, we offer a link at the end of paragraph 3 that takes the user to another page that has the complete product desciption. This page is 90% similar to the main product page...except that the product description is longer.

The same is true for user reviews. If we have more than 6 reviews, we offer a link to a similar page that has the full listing of user reviews. Again, this is an exact replica of our main product page with expanded user review content.

The above allows for 3 pages for each of our products.

My web team would like to consolidate this information into one page, using hidden div tags. If you look at products on target's website, you will see they have tabs at the bottom, and when clicked, hidden content behind them is shown. This is what we want to do, but I've read and heard elsewhere that target's use of hidden div tags isn't safe. However, the content is still in the source and is indexable.

So, is duplicating target's technique a safe thing to do?



10+ Year Member

Msg#: 31197 posted 5:45 pm on Sep 14, 2005 (gmt 0)

If you do not want/need that additional hidden text to be indexed, you should be able to do it with a document.write in JavaScript. This way, the hidden text will not be visible to the SE's.

Keep in mind that as a rule Google checks to see if something you did is good for the user. If so, they don't penalize you for it.

While you should do some more research on it, maybe someone else can chime in with some additionl insight.


WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

Msg#: 31197 posted 5:00 am on Sep 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

One of my clients does this with a book site, now into it's third year. As a general rule I see this arrangement as a disadvantage, for these reasons:

All the content exists in one html document, rather than being distributed through several. This means fewer possible pages to be considered in any given search result, and the extra crush of text can tend to swamp important keywords so they don't rank as well. The more text you consolidate onto a single page, the stronger this effect seems to be.

When someone arrives from a search engine, their particular keywords may be hidden from view and then you lose them. So it's best to write a script that exampines inbound traffic from search engines and make sure a div that holds their keywords is switched to visible -- that's extra processing time and time to render the page.

Then there's also the fact that by eliminating so many urls on a site, you are also taking away internal links and PageRank may suffer.

That said, it can be very convenient for the user, and therefore boost sales. The page changes configuration locally rather than needed another server hit -- it's pretty sweet.

There are other technical reasons that my client wanted to go this way from the start -- I would have preferred separate pages and I still do, but their back end setup makes a separate page arrangement a bit problematic.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved