Brett_Tabke
msg:757704 | 2:20 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
lol! too funny.
|
DamonHD
msg:757705 | 2:34 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Quick! Tin-foil hats! It's all true.
|
rustybrick
msg:757706 | 2:46 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
AdWords (and those vertical searches) are the only results higher then the number one position in Google's organic results. To bad you can't go higher then the 1st position in organic. ;(
|
longen
msg:757707 | 3:02 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
So now we introduce Quantum Mechanics to SEO.
|
FromRocky
msg:757708 | 3:10 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
You can go higher by using AdWords.
|
Critter
msg:757709 | 3:11 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Just to disprove your silly theory: I have, many times, risen above the #1 position to take the #0 position. Quack...
|
webdude
msg:757710 | 3:37 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
rfontaine, I have seen this phenenom too with a couple of my sites. One was returning #1 for several years and is now at #7. I noticed this on a couple of my #1 sites. I have been investigating this for the past couple of years. I will post any results I find.
|
webhound
msg:757711 | 3:37 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
yup thats a good one. :-)
|
europeforvisitors
msg:757712 | 4:15 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| You can go higher by using AdWords. |
|
That just goes to show that it's all about the money, and stockbrokers are now turning the algorithm dials and pushing the ranking buttons at the Plex. Sergey and Larry are being retrained as ad reps, GoogleGuy will soon be replaced by WallStreetGuy, and Eric Schmidt is overseeing the changes from his new office on the grassy knoll.
|
walkman
msg:757713 | 4:55 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
>> Once you are in the #1 Position google WILL NOT let you get any higher Are you serious? Can anyone else verify this? if true, GoogleGuy owes us an explanation! it definitely proves that Google is manipulating serps to push adwords. ;)
|
Murdoch
msg:757714 | 4:58 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Google is now testing a beta product which will project a holographic image over the top of your monitor for those willing to pay for super-ultra-premium sponsor space....
|
rfontaine
msg:757715 | 7:56 pm on Sep 7, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Actually, all your web sites are in all Google position results at once for every page and every keyword - and so is everyone elses! Only you don't know it when looking out from the results you see at the moment. This is the new physics of SEO and this is the answer to all the confusion and gnashing of teeth we see on webmasterworld when it comes to Google SEO.
|
jtbell
msg:757716 | 5:02 am on Sep 8, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| Just to disprove your silly theory: I have, many times, risen above the #1 position to take the #0 position. |
|
Does this have anything to do with the "yogic flying" that they teach at Maharishi International University? :-)
|
Wizard
msg:757717 | 6:35 am on Sep 8, 2005 (gmt 0) |
You can go higher with other phrases :)
|
aris1970
msg:757718 | 8:08 am on Sep 8, 2005 (gmt 0) |
LOL! Please write a tutorial on your findings; it will become a best-seller. :-)
|
sabine7777
msg:757719 | 6:42 am on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Yes, that's what's been happening to my site which has been around for 10 years and FIRST on All natural search results for my topic. Since sept 2004 I have been vanishing every 6 weeks or so, and now more often than that. Is that why Google is doing it?. Advertising with adwords is sooo expensive now and I can't afford it all the time--I'm just a small business. They never tell me why, they always respond the same way. Are they doing it so that we will advertise with them?. But the other high ranking sites of my type never vanish. Why me?
|
ann
msg:757720 | 7:01 am on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Oh no! we can't go higher than #1? Then why do I keep trying and trying and trying and.. Ann
|
SuddenlySara
msg:757721 | 7:15 am on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
mmmmm Brett ;-) Do you bake cookies too?
|
iProgram
msg:757722 | 10:29 am on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
I have a #1 key phrase since 2004 and what they did is adding three interesting inner links under page description:)
|
Tropical Island
msg:757723 | 10:35 am on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
It's just amazing how we all get so bored when there's not an update to complain about :-)
|
sabine7777
msg:757724 | 12:57 pm on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
You don't understand--my site disappears completely from Google--Gone, caput, zero, nada! from first to nothing for up to 2 weeks at a time--why are you mocking me?
|
DamonHD
msg:757725 | 1:02 pm on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Some people just don't get irony... Bv< Rgds Damon
|
Lorel
msg:757726 | 2:20 pm on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Have you tried checking your code for errors?
|
BonniesGang
msg:757727 | 2:26 pm on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
<<<<<why are you mocking me?>>>> Nobody is mocking you - just having fun with the OP. <<<<<Since sept 2004 I have been vanishing every 6 weeks or so, and now more often than that. Is that why Google is doing it?. Advertising with adwords is sooo expensive now and I can't afford it all the time--I'm just a small business. They never tell me why, they always respond the same way. Are they doing it so that we will advertise with them?. But the other high ranking sites of my type never vanish. Why me? >>>>> I noticed the same thing on one of my sites pre Florida. The site was #1 for a very competative porn star name for a number of years. About 6 months before Florida - the site was doing the same dissapearing act as you mention. Since Florida it has never reappeared in the serps. What does it mean? My theory is that certain tokens get put through the filter and some don't. When your site dissapears and reappears - the plex is testing adding your token to the barrel. My guess is that next update your site will be at #356 and all sites that link to you will be way ahead of you and you won't be listed for your company name. <<<<<Are they doing it so that we will advertise with them?>>>>> Hello Jello! (Foil hat firmly in place.)
|
Kirby
msg:757728 | 2:57 pm on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
There is a new ebook out on how to beat this sinister Google ploy. If only url drops were allowed...
|
DamonHD
msg:757729 | 3:20 pm on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Hi K, But I think you could search for it at [google.com...] ... No, wait, ... Rgds Damon
|
BillyS
msg:757730 | 3:41 pm on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| Google Penalizes for being #1! Yes, it's true! Once you are in the #1 Position google WILL NOT let you get any higher, but WILL allow you fall - often drastically! |
|
This happens time and time again on this forum. Just because this is your experience does not mean this is how Google really works. Stick to the facts and we'll all be better off.
|
mikeD
msg:757731 | 5:04 pm on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
i am seeing the samething sabine7777, I have no proof, but the clues point to your theory.
|
imstillatwork
msg:757732 | 6:23 pm on Sep 20, 2005 (gmt 0) |
higher then #1? higher than adwords placements? like someone types in www.google.com and up pops your page?
|
| This 41 message thread spans 2 pages: 41 ( [1] 2 ) > > |
|
|
