| 4:07 pm on Aug 16, 2005 (gmt 0)|
It's something Google has been testing for a while. You can't control it. It only appears for some searches, some of the time, in some regions.
| 4:21 pm on Aug 16, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Ahhh, I wondered what was going on - I did a search for my site earlier, and it (the top result) got the same thing - four small sub-links to random pages on the site (some of which are dead - very odd).
But when we tried to replicate it later, we couldn't.
| 12:36 pm on Sep 15, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I've noticed far more of these 'Rich Content' links. Search a large concern such as IBM if you need an example.
How and who gets them? Can we apply for them?
| 1:49 pm on Sep 15, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I guess you would have to be quite firmly rooted in that first position in SERPs for a while to get there.
At least, there is no question about whether a site is seen as an authority site by Google any more...
| 2:46 pm on Sep 15, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I mentioned this somewhere else but it is relevant here.
mysite.co.uk doesnt get the extras beneath it but
It is the only page on my site that does.
| 6:27 am on Sep 16, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Bizarre, and now I just saw that one of the larger spammy, affiliated-with-anything-that-moves sites, filled with useless pageholders and misleading info just to be able to put up 20 ads, has their index page displayed in this manner.
So much for authority...
| 2:01 pm on Sep 16, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Do you ever report those sites to Google?
I do when one particularly annoys me - usually nothing in competition with my sites.