homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.167.174.90
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

    
Will Google Ban me using redirect script
perfectlover

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 29711 posted 6:51 pm on Jun 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

Hello
Will i be banned from google using redirect script for outbound links like this

href="http://www.yoursite.tld/cgi-bin/redirect.cgi?http://www.anothersite.tld"

(302 redirect). I would like to do this to count clicks.
Thanks

[edited by: ciml at 10:20 am (utc) on June 2, 2005]
[edit reason] Examplified [/edit]

 

TravelMan

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 29711 posted 12:11 pm on Jun 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

I very much doubt it.

Might be a good idea to block bots [webmasterworld.com] from your cgi-bin though.

Wouldnt want to contribute to the 302 hijack phenomenum thing now would you.

perfectlover

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 29711 posted 7:20 am on Jun 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

No more replies?

inbound

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 29711 posted 9:21 am on Jun 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

You could find yourself on an extended vacation in the sandbox, I have just had a site re-appear after 9 months, I can only put it down to a legitimate PHP redirection script that I wrote.

The fact that the site is back could mean tGoogle have fixed any issues though.

Langers

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 29711 posted 4:47 pm on Jun 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

u could also have rel="nofollow" in the links too.

europeforvisitors



 
Msg#: 29711 posted 5:24 pm on Jun 4, 2005 (gmt 0)


u could also have rel="nofollow" in the links too.

That's not a good idea for at least two reasons:

1) It discourages inbound links (who wants to link to a site that cheats with its outbound links?).

2) It isn't the way that Google and other SEs intended that "nofollow" be used, and since linking is the basis of Google's PageRank concept, it seems reasonable that Google might take a dim view of sites that try to hoard PageRank by using "nofollow" on non-blog links.

jsaipe

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 29711 posted 12:35 pm on Jun 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

This makes me question how I should link between my sites. Without publishing URLs, my sites sell a variety of consumer goods like books, cds, dvds, games etc etc. Each site has a different URL simply because they evolved that way over time.

At the moment each site links to the other sites at the top of each page (6 links in all).

So, given that each site has thousands of pages, they all have a fair few IBLs and equally external links from one another.

Given that they're all from the same IP address, is Google gonna catch on and penalise me? So far, it hasn't, but who knows....

My dilemma is: keep things as they are and hope for the best. Or, perhaps add "nofollow" to the links in the header? Or redirects instead? But of course then each site will suffer from a reduction of IBLs.

Soon I'm gonna launch the same sites overseas, and then the problem is amplified yet further.

Any thoughts?

J

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved