homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.68.132
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & brotherhood of lan & goodroi

Google SEO News and Discussion Forum

This 33 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 33 ( 1 [2]     
Was SEO Inc. banned from Google?
We can not find the top ranking SEO company in Google?
linkmaster




msg:758689
 6:23 pm on May 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

Don't know if anyone has heard, but one of the opt ranking SEO companies, SEO Inc. has recently been banned from the Google search engine? It does still remain, however, on Yahoo and MSN, etc..

Can anyone speculate as to why an SEO company was banned from Google?

 

jaffstar




msg:758719
 8:21 am on May 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

Besides 3 way linking, these guys bought massive amounts of links from various sites.

When they slipped a few positions, they probably bought some more, and the red flag went up.

I remember viewing a demo for some link software, where they actually use SI's website as an example showing the magical formula and analyzing their links.

Its pretty obvious what these guys were doing. They were exposed.

bts111




msg:758720
 9:47 am on May 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

I constantly received emails from them requesting link exchanges for their clients. I never would reply as the request was always in their best interests.

What goes around comes around...

Marketing Guy




msg:758721
 10:08 am on May 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

I think the real news is that anyone would WANT to rank for seo terms in the first place.

It's the first thing newbies look for when they've been burned by a failed SEO company, or just find about the industry and want to be number 1! ;) Meaning that there is a huge amount of business to be had - anywhere from 6 to 7 figures monthly.

I find the constant banter against ranking for SEO terms quite strange - yeh, it makes you a larger target and puts you directly in the limelight, but if you've nothing to hide then where's the problem?

It's no different than operating a big brand business that is under constantly media scrutiny - deal with it properly and it can be hugely profitable.

The moment you do anything from collecting links to putting a bold tag around your pet keyword you're blacker than coal.

I agree to a certain extent, but I think there is a lot of SEO stuff that SE's would be happy to accept (good highlighting, spiderable pages, etc) and other stuff they never will (spamming). There is a difference - not really the huge ethical issue that some may make it out to be though.

No delusions of what we do for a living though - we are indeed artificially enhancing a websites ranking and Google know it. It's just how far we push the boat out that dictates how well tolerated (in the SERPs) we are.

This 33 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 33 ( 1 [2]
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google SEO News and Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved