| 8:10 am on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
The best way I've found to find a 302 to your url is to search for some unique text from your page in quotes. The offending page will show up and you can view the google cache of the page to see if it matches yours.
| 10:58 am on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
"My conjecture is that G knows (and cares) about this issue, but is trying to find an algo type solution to it. Expect great fanfare and praise when the problem is finally solved"
That's probably why the small post alegra update brings back pages lost at 5 of february, are coming back in most DC's?
| 11:49 am on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Some of my company's sites are affected by this problem (as far as I understand it from your posts).
Searching for (www.mysite.com -site:www.mysite.com) on Google and looking for all-smal-caps-in-the-title links listed using our descriptions, I have found that all of them are from for-sale domains registred mostly by www.directNIC.com, www.domaincontender.com and some others.
Is there any sense in contacting these companies?
Thanks a lot!
| 11:55 am on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I think you can see in the serps how big a problem this hijacking is, if you have noticed the last 6 month, you see more omitted results, which could be because there are so many dublicated results now because of the googlejacking and suplemental results and URL only, that all has in a way relation to this hijacking/rdirecting problem or it could have Im not 100% sure.
If you look at it you have NEVER seen google in such a shape before and it all realy kicked off when they added all those fake sites.
A solution?, we have to face it googleguy or other would not reply to this post because it is a HUGE problem and could have effects on there stock, the only way we can (fix) this is by posting the problem to other internet/business News sites if that does not have a effect there are the papers, we have such a big bunch of kreativ webmasters here that there should be no problem and everyone has there right to there comments its up to the news if they want to publish.
| 12:05 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
|posting the problem to other internet/business News sites |
We will run this on one of our tech related sites (we already have an article about Allegra and the MIAs).
If anyone has something written or already live sticky me.
(claus how is your's coming along? )
| 4:19 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I had about 7 redirect links show up in my allinurl command last Nov when we were disussing this matter and wrote google about it with the special email that was provided especially for this problem and also contacted those offenders who had emails and about 1/2 of those links are no longer effective (server could not be found error) and the tracker2 redirects have totallydissappeared and the others are directories with a link to one of my sites. So while all but the tracker2 links still appear in my allinurl command 1/2 of them no longer work and there are no new links there either. So something is changing.
PS. Does anyone know if that special email to google still works. I've forgotten what the subject line was suppoed to say.
| 7:04 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I am working on something as well... I will sticky you when we are done.
[edited by: crobb305 at 7:27 pm (utc) on Mar. 10, 2005]
| 7:21 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
save yourself the trouble. It will not make a difference. Many of us have sent it months ago.
"PS. Does anyone know if that special email to google still works. I've forgotten what the subject line was suppoed to say."
| 7:25 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Drop an email to webmaster [at] google.com with the keyword "canonicalpage"
| 8:50 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
A couple of nights ago a programmer friend of mine came over and we talked about various solutions, one of which involved aiming the redirect script right back at the pagejackers site. Well, I tried it and it works.
What it does is cause the user's browser to loop, thus making it a problem to click on the redirect link.
I don't know how googlebot would respond to the script, my guess is that it simply ignores it and continues indexing the content as if it were the pagejacker's but at least it makes the pagejacker's site a real nuisance.
What I am wondering about is how Googlebot would interpret the script and if it can be guided to another page (which could be excluded by a robots.txt file) full of spam, perhaps excessive repetition of a keyword or something similar. This way the hijacker's site would be penalized.
Think it might work?
| 9:35 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
>> one of which involved aiming the redirect script right back at the pagejackers site
In order to do this, you check for the URL of the page the redirect is on, right? Googlebot wouldn't ever notice that script, see msg #54 of this thread [webmasterworld.com].
If not so, please post a little more details.
>> claus how is your's coming along?
See link above, sofar it's only there. I know it's a pain to link to a specific forum post deep inside a thread, but it seemed like the best place to post it, as we had a lot of those hijack threads already and i didn't want to start yet another.
(i'll sticky you on the progress, if any - i'm a busy man you know, not a lot of time for creating content for myself *lol* ADDED: That post do need a little editing for more clarity, and the last 2 points were perhaps a little too simplified.)
[edited by: claus at 10:32 pm (utc) on Mar. 10, 2005]
| 9:50 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
|In order to do this, you check for the URL of the page the redirect is on, right? |
Actually it checks 2 variables, the length of the script (over 100 characters) because this 'network' of hijackers all use the same formula, and for the referrer. if (document.referrer&&document.referrer!="") if (poshost+lunref > 100)
| 9:52 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Bobby keep us updated, but still I hope we can get google fix there problem, because not everyone can handle scripts
| 10:01 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Still, making the redirect unusable for real users might accomplish something by itself, but only if the publisher of the redirecting site cares if his/her links work for users or not.
| 10:06 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
The script is easy to place in any html, asp or php file, the question is whether or not it's possible to penalize the hijacker without doing damage to your own site. That's why I suggested creating a "spam" page just for cases where there are hijackers whose formula can easily be identified. The robots.txt file in theory should exclude the bots from indexing the spam (in theory).
What we need now is someone who can enlighten us as to how Googlebot would react to the script, would it consider the new redirect part of the hijacker's page or not? My guess is it would, especially if you use the same redirect script as they are using. If it works for them it will work for you.
Just to be extra careful you could put the spam page in another folder with a robots.txt telling the bots not to index the page.
| 10:08 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I just noticed an article listed in google news:
'Possible domain poisoning underway'
While the subject is hijacking, what is more important is the writer who wrote the article... if you click on the link of his name you would be able to clue him in to the posts going on here about 302 hijacking. It appears he might be interested in writing about such as issue.
I would do it but I don't know enough about 302 hijacking.
| 10:11 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
It is, but I believe you can integrate the script into an html link (as does the hijacker) so as to redirect the spider to the new spam page.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
| 10:37 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
>> enlighten us as to how Googlebot would react to the script
It would read it but the script would not be executed. So, unless you have the URL of the page with the hijack redirect written out in full text inside the script, i would not worry one bit, as Gbot would just ignore it.
 I suppose you don't have this, as it's in hidden inside the "referrer" parameter in stead, so no worries.
| 11:16 pm on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Although I do not fully understand the technical complexity of hijacking, I do understand how it works in principal. I have had many sites either intentionally or unintentionally redirecting to my top four sites for some time. However, I do not believe this has had any major impact up until now. However, it is my supposition that I had a domain name server glitch back in January and this failure gave the sites redirecting to mine added weight and thus Google saw these sites as my sites. The direct consequence is that my top four sites are now in Google’s supplemental index in a state of perpetual dormancy and no longer get spidered.
I find it difficult to believe and coincidence that my top fours site all because hijacked at the same time. I believe that they became vulnerable to hijacking since I had a domain name server glitch.
I want to know has anyone else experienced a similar situation as mine. All my sites are hosted with GoDaddy by the way.
| 12:43 am on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Yep Panacea, that could very well be what did it for you.
I saw the post two times in the other thread as well, but there's just too much to answer, sorry about that.
| 2:18 am on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Thanks for your response.
I am taking two measures because I know of nothing else I can do, the hijacking issue is entirely in the hands of Google.
For 3 of my hijacked sites I am going to get dedicated IP Addresses and remain with the current hosting, and for the forth site, I will switch the domain name server and hosting to Network Solutions. Do you think it is possible this may help in anyway?
| 8:18 am on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I specifically don't think anything about NetSol - meaning: Regardless of my opinion you will not be able to get me to recommend any one hosting company above another. That said, it's always a very good thing to put reliability at least a little higher on the priority list than cost. If you feel that NetSol is more reliable than your current host (i don't even have an opinion on that), then - by any means just go ahead and change.
Apart from this long disclaimer, perhaps making those DNS changes will do something. I'm having a hard time being really positive about it as i don't want to spread false hopes. Normally, changes like this are transparent to Googlebot, so it doesn't even notice that you switch hosts. It will only help to the extent that Google does not only monitor DNS changes, but also act upon them. This has been rumored in the past but it's still nothing but rumors.
| 12:00 pm on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I have noticed that troubles on all of my sites affected by this problem started on first of March.
Do you have a similar situation?
| 12:26 pm on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)|
The problem has been around for quite some time now, about a year. When your sites were affected depends on a number of different elements such as when the hijacking site linked to yours, when Google reindexed both sites and such.
An interesting phenomenon presents itself, sort of like Ping Pong.
If your site establishes good ranking in a major search engine (in my case the hijackers were probably using Overture as a basis) the hijackers spot you and steel your content thus causing the demise of your site (unless you have been well established and have some PR to sustain you). Once your site disappears from the SERPs then the hijackers do not redirect to your site anymore and your site can reappear.
Back and forth...
| 12:27 pm on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)|
| 1:19 pm on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Just wonderin' out loud here but...
Since it might be too complicated to filter OUT hijackers who use 302 redirects to position themselves in the SERPs (causing innocent sites to get the boot), couldn't Google filter IN 'honest' sites that it knows like Overture etc. and by default not follow the 302s?
| 2:21 pm on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)|
<<Do you have a similar situation?>>
Yes, March 1st.
| 11:13 pm on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Googlebot stopped visiting us late Feb 28, but we didn't notice any pages disappearing from the index until March 7.
After a number of e-mails, resubmitting, etc. Googlebot is now back, albeit slowly, and about 40% of our pages are back in the index, although not scoring as well as previously.
| 1:09 pm on Mar 12, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I have a fairly simple question, which may have already been answered somewhere in this topic, but unfortunately I don't know what most of these terms mean. So, my question is:
My site has been top 5 in SERPS on Google for about a year for my key terms. I was whacked by Allegra. If you type in my company name, I'm all over the place. I still have a PR5 and all my links. However, I'm not listed anywhere -- nowhere -- under my key terms.
When I type in inurl:www.mysite.com, the only sites that come up are my site and two other domains I own that redirect to www.mysite.com. Is it possible that I'm being penalized somehow for having otehr domains redirect to my homepage?
Any feedback would be great.
| 5:11 pm on Mar 12, 2005 (gmt 0)|
this is getting old. Come on Google. What the hell is going on?
| 5:22 pm on Mar 12, 2005 (gmt 0)|
If those other two domains are only for the purpose of providing links to your main site and don't have any value of their own - I read somewhere in another thread that Google is starting to penalize this tactic because so many spammers are doing it.
| This 206 message thread spans 7 pages: < < 206 ( 1 2 3 4 5  7 ) > > |