fatpeter

msg:135396 | 4:53 pm on Mar 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
takes me of the first page for my main keywords :(
|
kittykat

msg:135397 | 5:01 pm on Mar 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
i am seeing the same thing for keywords in spanish. this is a major advance. it would be really great to be able to optimize for accented keywords without having misspelled words all over the page.
|
fatpeter

msg:135398 | 5:05 pm on Mar 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
I've been trying to optimise for 4 combinations without accent and 4 with. I was first page for the 4 without but no where on the others. Now I'm between 8-12 for everything. Just have to work a bit harder to get back on the first page! :)
|
lazerzubb

msg:135399 | 6:12 pm on Mar 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Just like to point to related thread about this [webmasterworld.com...] I think it's a good choice to integrate it on general searches too.
|
steveb

msg:135400 | 7:54 pm on Mar 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
not true for spanish ó Totally different results. <edit that y is supposed to be an o with an accent>
|
webby2001

msg:135401 | 8:04 pm on Mar 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Time for the German Umlaut me thinks (äüö) :-)
|
kittykat

msg:135402 | 9:24 pm on Mar 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
I am getting similar results for spanish ó and o. try searching for a word with accent and without, the number of results is almost the same. as least searching from here, Mexico City
|
mfagan

msg:135403 | 9:34 pm on Mar 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Currently on Google.com: résumé [google.com]: 360,000 resume [google.com]: 368,000 résumé -resume [google.com]: 322,000 resume -résumé [google.com]: 458,000 Whatever that means... <added> 322,000 + 458,000 = 780,000 </added>
|
steveb

msg:135404 | 10:27 pm on Mar 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
well maybe it's just me but I couldn't care less about the number of results. If one way a page ranks 7 and the other way it ranks 24, that's all that matters to me.
|
kittykat

msg:135405 | 12:09 am on Mar 6, 2003 (gmt 0) |
periódico periodico same results
|
steveb

msg:135406 | 1:30 am on Mar 6, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Not in Los Angeles on .com, totally different (except the first result).
|
kittykat

msg:135407 | 4:39 am on Mar 6, 2003 (gmt 0) |
thats good to know. thanks.
|
fatpeter

msg:135408 | 9:50 am on Mar 6, 2003 (gmt 0) |
All day yesterday it was merged. The day before yesterday not. Now today they are unmerged again so they have changed it a couple of times. Interesting to see where it ends up!
|
instand1

msg:135409 | 12:09 pm on Mar 6, 2003 (gmt 0) |
So this change happened during the last two days?
|
|