| 4:04 am on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Interesting question and I don't know the answer but I have to ask:
This person did a great job for for years ... made a mistake and got fired? That doesn't sound cool. :(
| 4:27 am on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
>>Some few hours ago I've noticed that one of our main sites did not appear any longer in Google
A couple of questions you have to ask before taking any action: Is this because of normal Google palpitations with freshbot, everflux, etc.? Do you know that your site is actually banned or penalized? If so, what caused it?
To a big extent hidden links and [very small] link farms are no-nos. Used *conservatively* and in certain manners they might just serve to get your site noticed (nobody really knows the threshold) without being labled a "spammy" site. There are *some* legitimate reasons to do both.
And I guess when you say "link farm" I have to ask if this was an automated, out of her control sort of thing or a *normally acceptable* reciprocal links exchange? There are differences.
When it comes to Google, or any other SE, don't leap -- especially after a few hours -- you don't know what tomorrow will bring.
Might be being too protective but that my $0.02 plain.
| 10:33 am on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
If you have an employee and you ask her to add content to the site and to email other quality / on topic sites for links (reciprocal or not) - what would you expect?
Instead she had built several sites as subdomains (on our customers domains) without asking for permission. Each site with some 20 pages with random text from an old forum backup, filled up with keywords. All sites had been linked together plus links to the (actually) banned site.
On the banned site she did not add any content but added some hundred hidden links to lists to 30,000+ (thirtythousand) resumes and job descriptions (It's a kind of job database we are talking about)
I guess that's enough reason to fire someone.
I'm sure that this is a 'Banned by Google' issue as all the main domains she had used for the subdomain thing are not longer in Google's index. Can you imagine what our customers are asking me?
Any way - thank you for your help. Does anyone have some experience with banned sites?
| 11:03 am on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
That's a sad story but I just can't help but notice the trend.
...I got banned, I'll fix it - I didn't know...
...I got banned, my company will have money problems now...
...I got banned, I've fired an employee...
...I got banned, I'm going to lynch the webmaster...
...and hunt down his whole family...
...and sacrifice them in front of the googleplex...
LOL, it's just getting more and more dramatic.
And some of us still think google is not in complete dominance :)
| 11:50 am on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
>Will Googlebot visit such a banned site to see the changes we've made?
If you are truly banned, Googlebot will not (to my knowledge) visit the site. If you have a penalty, Googlebot should still visit the site and will eventually notice the changes.
In a ban, usually a human intervened to ban you from the index totally and (if this was the case) it means a human has to remove you from the Google banned list which will then allow Googlebot to crawl you again. This means you having to contact Google and get yourself re-reviewed.
As others have said, are you sure that you are banned? There are many other reasons you could fall out of the index.
| 12:25 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
|One of my employees has managed this site in an excellent way....To make it short .. this staff member is not longer working for us. She'd been fired today |
And a happy new year to you too!
<edit> Jack's post below: You're a bundle of cheer and goodwill aren't you? ;) </edit>
[edited by: nutsandbolts at 1:20 pm (utc) on Dec. 31, 2002]
| 12:27 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
>One of my employees has managed this site in an excellent way....To make it short .. this staff member is not longer working for us. She'd been fired today
She didnt do her job and what she did do was abuse the clients trust and set back the company.
Getting fired is fair play in that situation. The time of year is irrelevant.
| 12:54 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
You may have jumped the gun!
Do you still have a page rank? SERPS have been fluctuating for the past few days and I had a site fall from #2 to 75.
I doubt you have been penalized before the update.
| 1:07 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
"...what she did do was abuse the clients trust and set back the company..."
But was her motive to further the company´s goals without any personal gain?
Some of us make mistakes while working towards relevant objectives. Was she given strict parameters as to how to achieve them?
New fields where there is a lack of broad experience make it easy to bend rules unknowingly. Yes, she hurt your company but...
| 1:11 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
>If you have an employee and you ask her to add content to the site and to email other quality / on topic sites for links (reciprocal or not) - what would you expect?
Id say those are pretty clear guidlines.
I dont believe a professional webmaster could interpret that as "setup up subdomains on clients site, and interlink them all".
Yes, she may have taken the initiative and tried to help, but she should have consulted any other team members and management first.
And adding to a clients site without their permission, subdomain or not, is clearly bad practice.
| 1:25 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Some one who builds a link farm on sub domains and then puts in hidden links knows what they are doing!
I would have fired her as well, she could cost you alot of money and the loss of trust from your clients.
| 1:39 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I agree with Makemetop, rainbow- a penalized site will get visited, a banned site won't. Recovery for a penalized site, however, may not be automatic. Some penalties seem to require human intervention to remove. Unfortunately, Rainbow, you are probably headed for several months of difficulty, as you'll have to wait for updates to see if your situation has improved. Keep track of the logs, of course, to see if Googlebot is still visiting. If you don't see GB for a month, I'd suggest contacting Google (a slow and frustrating process) and/or working on a new domain (not always feasible). Good luck.
I sympathize on the employee firing - these decisions can be tough, and of course a lot depends on the direction and feedback that has been given. I'd give her an "A" for initiative, but an "F" for judgment... Overall, though, my experience has been it's better to act swiftly with a problem employee than to delay things. Inevitably, when you postpone dealing with a problem, something even worse happens later. It's almost always better for the employee, too - he/she can get on with finding a situation with a future instead of living on borrowed time in the current one.
| 2:31 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
"...Some one who builds a link farm on sub domains and then puts in hidden links knows what they are doing! ..."
Perhaps, but you cannot be sure.
Someone who has never touched fire will not know it burns. As I say, in a new field where many if not most are still trying to find where the limits are, the learning process includes making mistakes.
Firing an employee who has done a GREAT job to date is a harsh measure which by all means must include employee's personal motivation in his/her wrongdoing.
Was she trying to further the company's goals or was she using the company's resources for her own interests? THIS is crucial.
If you were to fire everyone who makes mistakes in an organization involved in a NEW field where the history of people crossing the line is limited, even vague, who is left?
You ought to give a GOOD employee a second chance. Specially if that employee has been performing GREAT! My humble opinion.
| 3:01 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Part of here monthly salary was a percentage of the revenues generated by this job database.
She was a long time reader of webmasterworld.
I think this is a strong indication for her intentions.
BTW: if you fire someone in Germany this can only be done with some weeks notice. In this case 3 months.
Roger (and all others):
G'Bot visited an hour ago (IP 64.68.82.xx?) all pages on all the domains. The bot didn't try to index any of the resume pages as there aren't any links to those any more (we had deleted the hidden links).
Typically after relaunching a site the bot will try to read 'old' pages as well. Don't know what the outcome will be .... let's sit and wait.
| 3:22 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
"...She was a long time reader of webmasterworld..."
Then, I agree she had enough means to know she was crossing the line. I myself learned about personal "misbehaviours" just by reading the board. Happy New Year everybody.
| 4:01 pm on Dec 31, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Happy New Year everybody. Only 7 hours to go hear in Germany.
Thank you for your help.