| 7:24 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I think, you will need a sitemap :)
| 7:26 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I think you may have a bit of a problem. I am no expert but I would say your side menu won't get followed at all.
| 8:07 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Hi QNetwork welcome, it has a nice look your site.
I think if you used dhtml menus like hierarchical ones rather than js menus the main link from the menu bar would be spiderable thus you would need to create an index page for each section with fixed links to the content. Spiders and those with security set to high would use that, the rest would use the dhtml drop down (hierarchical) menus.
left menu item
electronics leads to page /electronics/index.html or whatever with your content and links on it .. but mouseover creates a pop up menu for that section ..
Oops thats not what your site does now is it .. forget it .. im sorry I spoke now .... well heck posting anyhow took me all of a minute to write this :-)
I am sure you could create the same effect as you have with a more spider friendly method.
Someone with a clue will no doubt be along shortly :-)
| 3:09 am on Oct 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I have used DHTML menus quite a bit and researched this topic a bit as well... I have proved to myself through actual SE results over time that they do not spider. My work around is a duplicate text-only menu I place at the bottom of each page.
| 1:36 pm on Oct 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Thanks for all the answers. I went ahead and added a site map link at the bottom of the home page. Site map got every link in text.
| 1:50 pm on Oct 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
There are no problem with *your* DHTML menu. BTW you always can test it with the spider simulater here : [searchengineworld.com...] to see how a robot see your page. On more sophisticated "software style" DHTML menu, usually Google see the first level for link but cant see the second and up level.
| 6:04 pm on Oct 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Thanks Allergic. I just tried the spider simulator. I did not show any of the links from menu. Anyway I liked that tool.
| 7:24 pm on Oct 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
| 8:34 pm on Oct 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Good suggestion. I'll make the changes.
| 2:13 pm on Oct 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
|I think you could try a bit more simple change: the <NOSCRIPT> tags - spiders care about 'em in order to get links listed there... I guess... |
| 5:45 pm on Oct 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
| 6:34 pm on Oct 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Your biggest issue is the dyanamic pages.
| 6:45 pm on Oct 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I verified that the site works okay with even "low" setting in IE. If you trun off active scripting, the menu does not appear. I have no clue how many average users go that far. You might be right about the spiders. That's why I added the site map.
| 6:47 pm on Oct 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
|Your biggest issue is the dyanamic pages. |
Biggest issue in terms of what? Spidering? Googleguy mentioned in one of the threads that Google is spidering dynamic pages well. FAST does it pretty good too. Let me know if you think there is nay other issue related to the dynamic pages.
| 7:04 pm on Oct 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
But it doesn't work of you set it to "high".
It is a problem with some real store sites and manufacturer sites though. they seem to be willing to throw out the 20% of users that do not use IE, or an even higher percentage when they start requiring lower security settings, or even flash.
| 7:21 pm on Oct 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Accept my appologies. I wanted to mean "medium", not "low". Obviously it works with "low". You put in thinking phase again. I got rid of the image-based menu, so that the pages load faster. If that prohibits users to view the page correctly, I do not think its worth it. I agree with you that the people with HIGH safety setting will rarely be frequent visitors of this site. Still I do not want to miss them.
| 3:51 am on Oct 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Thanks every one for providing me with so many important suggestions. I changed my home page menu to image links. Looks like the same. Load time is little bit more, but eventually will make the site much more spider-friendly (which counts a lot). Users with HIGH safty settings should not have any problem. I'll eventually change the other pages with this new image-based menu. Thanks again.
| 3:59 am on Oct 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Instead of your_dhtml_menu.js, can I use [domain.com...]
Or is there any other way, where I can use the code that will work on different level categories?
| 4:32 am on Oct 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
This is not exactly a link ;)
Perhaps because of this, I've never seen Googlebot [and I mean 'Googlebot' he..] fetching a .js "pointed" by a "src='".
| 8:51 pm on Oct 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
So what would be a way, where I can call the java code from same subdirectory (one sub dir under root for all js files), but use it everywhere on the web site (1100+ sub directories).