lazerzubb
msg:124993 | 11:37 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
yep
|
lazerzubb
msg:124994 | 11:39 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
WOW they withdraw it quickly! But nell was right there was a different index on WWW2 and WWW3
|
rfgdxm1
msg:124995 | 11:40 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I'm not seeing it, and this includes doing a link:www.yahoo.com check on www2 and www3.
|
rfgdxm1
msg:124996 | 11:43 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
>But nell was right there was a different index on WWW2 and WWW3 Did you do any link: checks for different numbers of links on www2 and www3? Perhaps they are warming up for the dance if 2 people saw this.
|
lazerzubb
msg:124997 | 11:44 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Believe me i know when it's an update, (i am rather famous for it :) ) And they changed the DNS'S for WWW2 and WWW3 yesterday which they usually do 1 day before update.
|
aek
msg:124998 | 11:44 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
It must of been there for a minute, lazerzubb is always right about these things.
|
Mr_Tickle
msg:124999 | 11:44 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Not seeing it either. Identical number of backlinks to BBC news site on WWW, WWW2 and WWW3. Looks like GG is teasing us ;)
|
tmott
msg:125000 | 11:46 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
May have been positions changing due to that new everflux thing. One of my sites moved up a position yesterday, then moved back down today and I saw it happening first in www2 and www3.
|
Andrew Thomas
msg:125001 | 11:47 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Im not an expert, but one of my descriptions on www3 has changed since this morning! But no other changes to my sites that i can see.
|
nell
msg:125002 | 11:47 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Less than 3 minutes after I noticed the differences between WWW, WW2 and WW3 all reverted back to WWW results.
|
tigger
msg:125003 | 11:47 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
BTW Did you know false update calls now have a penalty of 200 postings deleted from your total? :)
|
jackofalltrades
msg:125004 | 11:50 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
ive noticed changes to my results (i altered filenames thru the course of the month and theyve been reflected in results over the past few days). is this "the" update or a minor update (or me going mad)?
|
lazerzubb
msg:125005 | 11:50 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
jackofalltrades Minor, not the big one.
|
rfgdxm1
msg:125006 | 11:51 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
One thing I am noticing. I checked 6 different search terms, and the first 100 SERPs on www, www2 and www3 are *exactly* the same. As if at this moment they are pointing those all at the exact same data. Earlier today this wasn't the case. The fact 2 different people spotted this within a minute of each other makes me suspect something is up.
|
caine
msg:125007 | 11:52 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Yep, false calls deserve a descent slapping. I can't see nothing. Boring.
|
Iguana
msg:125008 | 11:55 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I confirm the update - yahoo up to 657,000 back links
|
Mr_Tickle
msg:125009 | 11:55 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Am now seeing it. Significant difference in backlinks between WWW, WWW2 and WWW3. Good luck to all ! Game on !
|
lavapies
msg:125010 | 11:55 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
i take it back, just seen a big change on www2 and www3 :-)
|
Shakil
msg:125011 | 11:56 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
no changes here in the UK. i say we delete this posting, and wait (aaaarghhhh) again for the next one, although I must say the blood rushed to my head when I saw the post 10 minutes ago. Shak
|
nutsandbolts
msg:125012 | 11:57 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Well slap-a-my-nose! I'm back! Oh Google, I love you. I adore you. I want to give you children... (or at least a keg of beer....)
|
sw8296
msg:125013 | 11:57 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
it's on seeing 657000 for www.yahoo.com on www3
and 634000 on www edit: also seeing backlinks on www3 for my new, previously unindexed site.
|
Andrew Thomas
msg:125014 | 11:58 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Its started, as a url of mine not indexed before wasnt there 2 minutes ago, and now it is yipeeee
|
Iguana
msg:125015 | 11:59 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I promise, I have never posted on an update thread to say hooray my sites are doing well BUT my main sites backlinks just went from 300 to 1140:) Sorry, I'll never do it again
|
Shakil
msg:125016 | 11:59 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
YES, seeing different stuff on www2 and www3 (different link totals etc etc) Shak
|
rfgdxm1
msg:125017 | 12:01 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
>Yep, false calls deserve a descent slapping. I can't see nothing. Boring. Are you sure it was a false call, or perhaps nell and lazerzubb did see something? *I* am seeing: Searched for pages linking to www.yahoo.com. Results 1 - 10 of about 657,000. Search took 0.09 seconds. On www2. Looks to me like these 2 get the medal, not the booby prize. ;)
|
zeus
msg:125018 | 12:03 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
OK now I see it different results on www3 -www and different link backs to my site. It HAS started for SURE, let the dance begin. zeus
|
Dino_M
msg:125019 | 12:10 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I must have been mad to be looking forward to this! My back links have dropped from 1200 - 329
how in monkeys has this happened you can't tell me 70% of the people who link to me decided to drop them? No change in PR yet when might this expect to change, soon?
|
rfgdxm1
msg:125020 | 12:10 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
At the risk of being forever banned by the mods here, I declare the dance to be on! The good news for me is both of my sites are definitely in. One has hit an unbelievable #1 for one of my 3 main keywords. However, I had something like this happen once before and slid back down to lower on page 1, so I am not getting giddy, and will wait for the dance to end.
|
Shakil
msg:125021 | 12:11 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
London, all looking good, even Google Category description is showing new description, as in latest DMOZ. looking very nice so far. Shak
|
| This 452 message thread spans 16 pages: 452 ( [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16 ) > > |
|
|
