| This 275 message thread spans 10 pages: < < 275 ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] ) | |
| Google June 2002 Update
June - 23 - 2002 - 1:00pm pst |
BryantStevens
msg:44799 | 8:00 pm on Jun 23, 2002 (gmt 0) |
link:www.yahoo.com on www.google.com = 623,000
link:www.yahoo.com on www2.google.com = 628,000
link:www.yahoo.com on www3.google.com = 628,000 link:www.webmasterworld.com on www.google.com = 3940
link:www.webmasterworld.com on www.google.com = 3990
link:www.webmasterworld.com on www.google.com = 3990
|
zeus
msg:45069 | 8:16 pm on Jul 2, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I just searched for my site under the main keyword and my site was gone on www3, so the update is not complete yet. They are BACK zeus
|
coconutz
msg:45070 | 8:21 pm on Jul 2, 2002 (gmt 0) |
We're seeing new results on www, and meta descriptions for our home page and an internal page. Previously, our meta desrciption was only used on www2 and 3.
|
richlowe
msg:45071 | 3:48 pm on Jul 3, 2002 (gmt 0) |
My own site has had trouble appearing in google for months, but now appears at the top for several of my chosen keywords. First pick on them all. It seems this update was good for me (also, as a side note, one of the big changes I made was to un-zeusify my link pages - that seems to have made quite a big difference.) Richard LOwe
|
Visit Thailand
msg:45072 | 3:52 pm on Jul 3, 2002 (gmt 0) |
un-zeusify meaning ?
|
richlowe
msg:45073 | 4:08 pm on Jul 3, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Zeus is a product designed to help maintain link exchanges. Unfortunately, it appears to have become mostly a spam machine (search engine and email spamming) and has been reported as causing a drop in PR if used (or at least if used poorly). I removed all references to Zeus, it's home site and heavily modified the pages, and now, one month later, I am back in google highly placed after trying for over 6 months! Richard Lowe
|
| This 275 message thread spans 10 pages: < < 275 ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] ) |
|
|
|
