Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 126.96.36.199 , register , free tools , login , search , subscribe , help , library , announcements , recent posts , open posts Subscribe to WebmasterWorld
/folder/ and /folder = duplicate content? with and without the trailing slash sean msg:176110 2:24 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0) Any ideas why Google would index folder-root files twice, both with and without the trailing slash? When searching for a specific text string, both of the variations below appear on the same SERPS:
Now, any ideas on how to get Google to only recognize one of the pages? The pages went from First to Worst around the time this bug surfaced...
Brett_Tabke msg:176111 11:10 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)
If both pages are not idential.
More than likely, you dropped a slash or a inbound link dropped a slash.
Your server is returning the same valid page for both.
a: adjust your server settings so that without the slash generates a 404 as it shou.d sean msg:176112 12:35 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)
You mean a 301?
...] : searchengineworld.com 301 = [ ...] webmasterworld.com 200 = [ ...] webmasterworld.com
I appreciate the response... time for me to begin a crash course in defensive webmastering.
petehall msg:176113 12:41 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)
adjust your server settings so that without the slash generates a 404 as it shou.d
I realise this is a Google related discussion, however Yahoo! trims the last / from any listing in it's SERPs.
I found it highly irritating and as such I have to ensure both combinations work or Yahoo! and MSN SERPs suffer...
Unless I am mistaken you will not find a single / as the last character of any link from Yahoo! or MSN SERPs.
[ edited by: petehall at 12:49 am (utc) on Nov. 26, 2004] encyclo msg:176114 12:44 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)
Also check your site's internal links with something like the W3C link checker [ validator.w3.org] or similar tool: more often than not there's an internal link pointing to the directory, but without the trailing slash.
petehall, I'd half-noticed that on one of my sites, but looking further you're completely right and it seems generalized. Usualy it's not too bad when you're talking about "genuine" directories (where the server software generates the 301 automatically), but it could be a problem when the directories are done with mod_rewrite and the appropriate rules are not in place for taking into account this problem. One more reason why I like file extensions on rewritten URLs.
sean msg:176115 1:14 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)
Turns out the slash-less links are coming from scraper sites.
Hopefully, SERPs will not take too long to return to normal.