Brett_Tabke
msg:176111 | 11:10 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0) |
If both pages are not idential. More than likely, you dropped a slash or a inbound link dropped a slash. Your server is returning the same valid page for both. q: Fix?
a: adjust your server settings so that without the slash generates a 404 as it shou.d
|
sean
msg:176112 | 12:35 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0) |
You mean a 301? [searchengineworld.com...] :
301 = [webmasterworld.com...]
200 = [webmasterworld.com...] I appreciate the response... time for me to begin a crash course in defensive webmastering.
|
petehall
msg:176113 | 12:41 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0) |
| adjust your server settings so that without the slash generates a 404 as it shou.d |
|
I realise this is a Google related discussion, however Yahoo! trims the last / from any listing in it's SERPs. I found it highly irritating and as such I have to ensure both combinations work or Yahoo! and MSN SERPs suffer... Unless I am mistaken you will not find a single / as the last character of any link from Yahoo! or MSN SERPs. [edited by: petehall at 12:49 am (utc) on Nov. 26, 2004]
|
encyclo
msg:176114 | 12:44 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Also check your site's internal links with something like the W3C link checker [validator.w3.org] or similar tool: more often than not there's an internal link pointing to the directory, but without the trailing slash. petehall, I'd half-noticed that on one of my sites, but looking further you're completely right and it seems generalized. Usualy it's not too bad when you're talking about "genuine" directories (where the server software generates the 301 automatically), but it could be a problem when the directories are done with mod_rewrite and the appropriate rules are not in place for taking into account this problem. One more reason why I like file extensions on rewritten URLs.
|
sean
msg:176115 | 1:14 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Turns out the slash-less links are coming from scraper sites. Hopefully, SERPs will not take too long to return to normal.
|
|
