jonrichd
msg:212765 | 10:50 pm on Oct 4, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Looks to me like the date was improperly stored by Google. If I remember right, dates are typically stored as a number, with 0 being January 1, 1970. Your date is just before that.
|
moltar
msg:212766 | 11:05 pm on Oct 4, 2004 (gmt 0) |
It's a new Google Service - time travel :D
|
PhraSEOlogy
msg:212767 | 12:32 am on Oct 5, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Found this definition of that timestamp: "Sometimes a non-existing time, such as the time of creation of something that does not exist, is indicated as 23:59, 31 Dec 1969.
" on UNIX based systems.
|
tomasz
msg:212768 | 2:57 am on Oct 5, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Yep, Unix time is long integer value in seconds difference from 1/1/70
|
edit_g
msg:212769 | 3:07 am on Oct 5, 2004 (gmt 0) |
You should be seeing some benefits then, if the algo is indeed biased towards old, established, sites. ;)
|
Stefan
msg:212770 | 3:37 am on Oct 5, 2004 (gmt 0) |
| the time of creation of something that does not exist |
|
º¿º Just when you think things can't get any more confusing... If someone feels like pitching in and explaining what that means, it would be much appreciated.
|
Spica
msg:212771 | 4:02 am on Oct 5, 2004 (gmt 0) |
It means your site will never drop out of the Google index. It has been grandfathered.
:)
|
wanderingmind
msg:212772 | 4:33 am on Oct 5, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Isn't this sometihng serious? Recently there was a 'panic spidering' according to Brett, then pages being dropped and brought back in and dropped again and back.. in a days time.. and now this.. is there are problem at the plex?
|
|
