yonnermark
msg:82089 | 1:29 pm on Jul 17, 2004 (gmt 0) |
| And why is the allintitle figure lower than the "allintitle" figure? |
|
Is it just me or....?
|
aadje
msg:82090 | 1:09 am on Jul 18, 2004 (gmt 0) |
I think the trick of understanding lies in the "
|
Marcia
msg:82091 | 1:29 am on Jul 18, 2004 (gmt 0) |
allinanchor: ain't what it used to be either.
|
reddevil
msg:82092 | 3:25 am on Jul 18, 2004 (gmt 0) |
I think allintitle must be broke?
|
Powdork
msg:82093 | 4:40 am on Jul 18, 2004 (gmt 0) |
I think we must assume all these special searches are "broken" intentionally by Google because they could all be summed up with the allinSEO search. This also applies to the link: command, although the site: command still seems to be working properly.
|
BigDave
msg:82094 | 5:38 am on Jul 18, 2004 (gmt 0) |
How is it broke? What does google tell you that it does that it is not doing?
|
Powdork
msg:82095 | 5:55 am on Jul 18, 2004 (gmt 0) |
'Tis not broke, thats what the quotes were supposed to signify. If a search parameter is only (or vastly) used by SEO types, then it's results should be taken with a grain of salt. That's all I meant to infer.
|
BigDave
msg:82096 | 6:45 am on Jul 18, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Powdork, I was actually intending the question for reddevil. I want to know where everyone gets all these assumptions about how the allin commands "work"
|
Powdork
msg:82097 | 7:35 am on Jul 18, 2004 (gmt 0) |
oops.
This forum needs more icons.
There is none for 'oops'. Other forums have lots more and allow for better communication of the feelings associated with the written word. Of course, when i have paid something for the bandwidth associated with my use, i can complain more about it. :~[
|
|
