| 10:59 am on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
normal GB or GB/Test? Would be really surprised. Do you have the IP?
| 2:27 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
human at the plex...they surf too.
| 3:47 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
|I typed in a few words to see if probably a human editor was behind all this, then I released the bot out of the chat. |
Guessed it's not a human being than ...
| 3:56 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Doesn't that chat type have a "push" feature for sending pages to the visitor?
Next time think to start pushing all the pages you've been trying to get indexed.... :)
| 3:58 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Well I hope by now the GBot has learned to speak English. I just cant stand those conversations in binary lol.
| 4:06 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Googlebot/Test - picked the robots.txt and then hit directly into the chat.
In theory, my chat program has a push-function, but it is only available at a higher payment-level so I have switched it off.
| 5:32 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
did you do a reverse-lookup on the IP to check if it's really Google?
Just imagine what happens if GB starts indexing chats ... I see the next way for Spamming :)
| 5:37 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
ThomasB - Spamming over chats? To late - Spimming is already established!
| 8:19 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
but not for better SE rankings I thought ... I'd call it chamming.
| 8:24 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Unfortunately I do NOT have the IP address. I wasn't fast enough since it only showed up in the chat window and I didn't do a screenshot - the chat window deletes visitors who have left the site pretty fast.
It resolved however to crawler14.google(bot?).com and started with 62 or 64. I know, that's not much help...
Maybe GoogleGuy can shed some light on this? (Was this enough to summon him? :-)
| 8:31 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
I guess it would be pretty hard to determine if it's a chat or not unless you watch out for flush's on the client site (is that possible?)
But having a good robots.txt is then more important then ever.
| 8:36 pm on Apr 28, 2004 (gmt 0)|
You're absolutely right about the robots.txt - I wouldn't have thought about it. Blind spot so to say. I'm going to adjust it right away.
| 4:54 am on Apr 29, 2004 (gmt 0)|
is having a "good" robots.txt important if you don't really care what it goes through or caches?
I mean, if you WANT things to be cached.. can a robots.txt help?
| 8:30 am on May 4, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Now it's MSN-BOT who triggered my chat skript!
Still not fast enough the get the whole browser identification string.
| 3:24 pm on May 4, 2004 (gmt 0)|
| 8:30 pm on May 4, 2004 (gmt 0)|
The problem is that the chat itself is hosted by an external company (LivePerson, previously HumanClick). I found that - also in the GoogleBot example before - the chat is DIRECTLY triggered and not a page visited before. So maybe the bot is browsing the HumanClick/Liverperson site instead?
The chat on my page is initiated like this:
Where '1234567' is my chat-ID with them.
Is that any help?
[edited by: Marcia at 10:33 am (utc) on May 7, 2004]
[edit reason] Side scrolling. [/edit]
| 8:42 pm on May 4, 2004 (gmt 0)|
looks like a normal page. No reason not to follow it except if it's robots.txt prohibited imho
| 9:47 am on May 7, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Got it again - but this time I was better prepared:
How can I exclude the chat in robots.txt, since it is not in my page tree at all but hosted externally?
| 12:08 pm on May 7, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Yes, your chat command has both the <A HREF and the OnClick
that's what google uses
failing that, set the NO FOLLOW metatag in your page...
or, if you don't want google not to follow anything from that page...
put your link into a small <IFRAME > on its own small page, with the NO FOLLOW on the IFRAMEd page, not your main page. or even, write a page that your link opens, and that page REDIRECTs to your chat script, with a NO FOLLOW meta tag
| 1:32 pm on May 7, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Hmm... I guess I try the HREF-deletion first. As far as I can see it was never used by non-Java-visitors before.
Since the tag is automatically on EVERY page, the NOFOLLOW is not an option.
I'm not familair with Iframes at all, but I guess I can find a tutorial somewhere?
| 1:50 pm on May 12, 2004 (gmt 0)|
MSNBot is now a daily visitor in my chat since I haven't found time to change the link yet.
What is surprising (and totally unrelated to this thread) is that the frequency with which MSN visits my site has significantly increased over the last few weeks.
Are they deep-spidering the net to get food for their own search?
| 2:12 pm on May 13, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Weeeeellll.... I changed the code now, took the "href" portion out and it still works. Now let's wait for the next visit of one of them bots...
The problem is however, that the cursor doesn't turn into a hand anymore when I slide it over the trigger image.
| 2:20 pm on May 13, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Try adding style="cursor:pointer;" to the tag.
| 2:33 pm on May 13, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Actually adding href="" helped as well. Any advice against it?
| 11:56 am on May 14, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Maybe href="" doesn't work on all browsers. It shouldn't harm to do both, href="" and style="...".
| 6:10 pm on May 19, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Well... I'm slightly puzzled. MSN-Bot still chats, even though I removed all of the misleading href-tags.