| 6:29 pm on Apr 16, 2004 (gmt 0)|
> Oh wait - WebmasterWorld also has webmasterworld.org and the .net that redirect to webmasterworld.com. Does that mean we are spammers?
It gets worse than that, Brett. You own [searchengineworld.com...] too don't you?
Will it be seen as a bannable offence if someone contacts both and finds the same person? Would it be even worse if you linked the two sites together?
I think not.
| 7:51 pm on Apr 16, 2004 (gmt 0)|
I think the litmus test has to be would they structure their business as separate brands/sites if search engines didn't exist. In this case, they probably wouldn't since the sites basically all target the same group of customers.
When you have a set of products that target different customers/demographics/location/etc., then its much more natural to separate them so you can better tailor your marketing for each niche. This is what businesses like GM do with their different motor divisions. In the case of promotional items, separating them into separate sites is completely artificial - someone interested in promotional coffee cups would probably be almost equally interested in pens or t-shirts.
So if you have multiple sites that target mostly separate customer groups, its not spam in my mind. If you have multiple sites that all target the same customers and lead to a common receptionist answering the phone.. I'd say it is definitely spam.
But obviously whether I think its spam doesn't matter.. what matters is google, dmoz, etc.
| 8:16 pm on Apr 16, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Actually, from what I can tell, only some of his sites sell all the items.
Some of them are targeted to people looking for a specific item. For example mugpeddler is set up for the people that want just mugs.
Have you ever walked through a tourist shopping area?
In Ensenada there are all sorts of specialty shops and there are also everything shops and just about every level in between. Some people like to shop that big everything stores and might pick up a blanket and an ironwood carving at the same place. Others will prefer to go to the blanket shop for their blanket so they can concentrate on just that one type of item.
Personally, if I was looking for promotional mugs, I would rather go to the site that specializes so that I can concentrate on just that one thing.
| 10:29 pm on Apr 16, 2004 (gmt 0)|
I used to have something similar to this my industry.(no where near as professionaly done of course)
One big site that covered all niches and then lots of smaller sites dedicated to a particular niche.All had different content.
I was able to dominate some major keywords this way but since these last few months I am sure google have a algo that recognises the similarity of my sites through my links and now only allows me 2 spots in the top 10 instead of 6 or 7.
This promo network must be so well done that even its backlinks are substantially different.
I give it 10/10. :)
Interesting to me that yahoo dont rate them as highly
[edited by: Brett_Tabke at 2:44 pm (utc) on April 17, 2004]
[edit reason] please leave out adult references. [/edit]
| 10:51 pm on Apr 16, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Anyone remember this thread. [webmasterworld.com...]
| 11:24 pm on Apr 16, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Good reference. The interesting thing to me is the difference in the tone of the two threads which are essentially about the same thing. Has the new google algo spawned a new paradigm for seo? Just food for thought.
| 1:29 am on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Brett_Tabke, what ever way you want to spin it so, you pal gets and remains on top is you view. But, it just means that you OBVIOUSLY support these spamming techniques that ePromos and PromoPeddler practice period. Cheaters supporting cheaters. Google has clearly said that you can't create multiple sites to increase your PR, rankings and exposure.
| 2:00 am on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Yes but you can create multiple sites for other reasons and if Google ranks them well, often times its the search engine's fault rather than the webmaster. There is branding to consider as well.
| 2:30 am on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Just wondering, are you currently banned?
I found a site where someone with at least a very similar name cares way too much about the term "promotional items". If this is your site, you have a lot more to worry about than what company is taking up a couple of slots on the first page.
The one I'm looking at is banned from google, and it looks like it was for good reason. If this is your site, you should at least start with writing some copy intended for people instead of spiders, and clean up your HTML. There isn't much you can do about your past linking practices now.
| 4:57 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
NEGATIVE - bigDAVE! I am not banned. I am within the industry and that's why I know that these methods are spamming and cheating. All of us promotional items distributors sell the exact same 900,000 plus items. So, when they create these other sites - they set them up to sell a singal line (MAYBE not likely) but they sell everything. So, they are manipulating the serps. Call one of tomorrow if you don't believe maybe mugpeddler.com and see if they will sell you a pen. Of course they will. GET CLUE!
| 5:13 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Ok, here is one for you Brett & BigDave and whoever else. So, I guess creating all of the websites that are owned and operated by the same company (PromoPeddler), that is how all of the toll free numbers are answered to: PromoPeddler. And most if not all of the the websites have a link back to their main website: PromoPeddler. I know, I know - what you are think Brett and BigDave that, that is ok, too. They can inflate their main website with this linking struction. That's joke! If you truly believe that then, I got some really fine ocean front property in Oklahoma. GET REAL! Plain and simple : it cheating and you condone it!
| 5:18 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
By the way the #9 and #2 websites in the Google Serp's under promotional items is [newideapromos.com...] & [promopeddler.com....] What don't they have in common? Their different looking websites and different toll free numbers BUT they operated by the same company and SELL THE SAME STUFF. Can you say: SPAM?
This is SPAM 101.
| 5:46 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
|NEGATIVE - bigDAVE! I am not banned. |
Sorry about that then. After I posted, I checked your old posts, and became even more sure that I was right. I sounds like you got yourself in some pretty big trouble with Google last year.
|I am within the industry and that's why I know that these methods are spamming and cheating. |
That is quite a non sequitor.
Being in the promotional items industry does not make you an expert on what a search engine considers cheating. and it is the search engine that defines spamming and cheating, not you.
In fact, from reading your previous posts, it is quite clear that you had no idea about what might or might not be considered spamming or cheating.
|All of us promotional items distributors sell the exact same 900,000 plus items. |
Do you actually stock all that stuff or is it drop shipped? If you don't maintain an inventory, you are not a distributor.
|So, when they create these other sites - they set them up to sell a singal line (MAYBE not likely) but they sell everything. So, they are manipulating the serps. Call one of tomorrow if you don't believe maybe mugpeddler.com and see if they will sell you a pen. Of course they will. GET CLUE! |
Oh, I have a clue, and I do understand exactly what they are doing.
Your original complaint was that it was duplicate content, which it is not. Each of those sites is unique. If those sites were to be subject to the duplicate content filter, because they sold the same million items, then it sounds like all but one of you "distributors" offer duplicate content.
You complained about their group of sites taking up 2 spaces in aone search result. I do that all the time. In fact, There are some searches where my site has 2 results with the second indented. And both of the public archives of our e-mail list have indented results. that gives us 6 spots out of the top 10. That does not make it SPAM.
Just for your information, my first spam report was on a huge advertiser with Google, and they were banned 3 days later and didn't come back till they had quit cloaking. Google does not cut them any slack because they pay money. if Google agrees with you that it is an issue, they will be gone. If they don't, they will stay. You have reported them, now forget about it and go work on your own site.
Just because I can call mugpeddler on the phone and order anything does NOT make their online websites spam. What does being able to do something unadvertised over the phone have to do with their website and Google? I could also call the receptionist to find out if I can buy girl scout cookies from anyone there. That does not mean that their website that never mentions girl scout cookies is spamming the SERPs for girl scout cookies.
| 5:46 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
To quote Jon Glick, Yahoo!'s Senior Manager for Web Search, managing the core relevancy initiatives for Yahoo! Search:
"Yeah. Massively interlinked domains will most definitely get you banned. Again, it's spotted as an attempt to distort the results of the search engine. The general rule is that we're looking at popularity on the web via in-links. The links are viewed as votes for other pages. And part of voting is that you can't vote for yourself."
It sounds like Spam to me. I'd probably do it as well, but hey, lets all at least call a spade a spade.
| 5:51 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
By the way what would you call this Brett & BigDave:
Right, duplicate sites?
| 5:58 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Having all your sites linking back to your main site is not "massively intelinked".
Really, the problem here is that webmasters and SEOs do not understand what the search engine's priorities are. And that is why most spam reports go into the circular file.
If *you* decide that something is spam, doesn't mean that it is what the SE would consider spam.
| 6:03 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
By the way, BigDave - you are right on one thing. I will admit it, I did get in trouble with Google with Google a year and a half ago. I applied Michael Campbell's theories and got napped not knowing at the time that Google didn't like that. So, once it happened I asked Google what happened and what could I do but they never respond. So, I placed that under the category of not being a bigger enough payoff for Google so, they were willing to assist me in getting re-index. Since then after finding out the hard way that it wasn't the "PROPER" thing to do, I created a web site from stratch and have jus that one. And in response to your ccomment of not knowing much. Sometimes you have to ask nieve in order to get help so, I do. I know what spam is and I know the SEO world. I'm far from the best but I can hold my own.
Clearly, Google has changed it's policies or Google allows for cheaters with big pockets to cheat. I don't they have changed they policies. I don't think they want companies to make multiple websites in order to achieve better rankings which both PromoPeddler and ePromos has done and done for a long time now. So, that leaves one thing, either Google is getting paid and likes the money or Google has not yet seen this spam and once they do they will do the right thing and bann them both. We will see what Google is about: greed or better serp's for the searchers (supposedly that is what they say do).
| 6:06 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Yes, they are duplicates if you fix your broken URL.
But it is listed as a yahoo store for a legitimate reason. It should be filtered from the results, not banned.
It is not duplicated as a Yahoo store to gain PageRank. This passes the test of "Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?". Yahoo stores produce their own traffic even without SE results, so they most certainly would do this even if there was no SE.
| 6:08 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
bigDave - you didn't answer the question earlier:
What is this:
[epromos-com.store.yahoo.net...] (#10 under custom promotional items)
[eprmos.com...] (#1 or #2 under promotional items)
Just curious, what is the purpose here?
Right, duplicate sites and to achieve rankings for different terms?
SPAM, brother! Plain and simple - SPAM!
| 6:11 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Nice thread. I'm still waiting to see jb123's website.
Hey JB, it's not fair to complain about someone else without outing yourself, too.
So let's have the full monty with your website.
| 6:15 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Here is another one for you bigDave.
Now, what purpose did PromoPeddler set this site up for? They already have the PromoPeddler and NewIdeaPromos website that sell anything and everything under the sun.
Right, you guessed it. All three sites sell the samething. They created ANOTHER website to take up another ranking within the SERP's to gain traffic, clients and orders. Plus, they did it to create more links for themselves. This site see it links to PromoPeddler and MugPeddler.
| 6:21 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
It's fair because I'm not even on the radar screen for top rankings within this industry. As I said days ago, I don't mind that I'm not #1 (though I obviously would like to be) but what I do mind is that the SERP's be of good value to the searchers and Spammer (cheaters) to not gave an unfair advantage, which in these two cases they are. Just want a fair playing field. If we can all cheat fine or if we all can't fine but it needs to be that way for everyone to be fair. Google SHOULDN'T be able to make a rule but only enforce on the little guys with little money. If Google is going to hold themselves up in the spotlight as a FREE SE then, let's not allow money to influence the rankings or they should just be the NEW OVERTURE of the world.
| 6:25 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
>>It's fair because I'm not even on the radar screen for top rankings within this industry
Looks like Jason works his tail off; you might go out of business awaiting the outcome of your spam report. You've got your work cut out for you and a great model.
| 6:27 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
My word, you are wound up way to tight about this.
First off, think about all the wonderful links you are giving all those sites from this thread. That is mighty kind of you. lol
Something you might consider doing is watching Ron Popeil's infomercials on his rotisserie oven, and think about google spam reports as being something like that - "set it and forget it".
You have complained to google. You've done your part in the war on SPAM. Now walk away and put your attention into your own website.
Remember, none of the search engines owe you or anyone else a ranking or traffic.
Though now that I think of it, complaining here might have done one thing to help knock that evil spammer out of the top SERPs. Some of the rest of us might just decide to put up some pages selling "promotional items" for the fun of it to see how tough those top positions really are. We may just knock him down a few notches.
| 6:31 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Where is GoogleGuy when you need him? Maybe GoogleGuy will be kind enogh to read this thread and examine these two webistes PromoPeddler and ePromos and let us know if this SPAM? If so, why? And if not, why? They way we can either be sure not do to these same things or that we can do the same things immediately. I'll get godaddy on the phone waiting for his answer because I may need to purchase a couple thousands urls today.
GOOGLEGUY we need your opinion and advise, PLEASE!
| 6:35 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Hey JB -
I want to thank you for pointing out those sites.
I had no idea that the "promotional products" market was so lucrative.
Please feel free to drop my URLs into a Webmasterworld thread as a public spam report attempt in about 3 months.
You just got yourself another competitor (or rather a new "group" of competitors).
| 6:39 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Well, you are right about the links within this tread and I thought about that but if you look at their backward links currently compared to everyone else - it really doesn't matter. Except of course to get them the negative exposure that they deserve.
I really do wish that GoogleGuy would give his opinion. If he says it is safe and that these are fine ways to promote on Google then, I will GLADLY apoligize and then, go buy ten of hundreds of URLS and start promoting the sameway.
Regarding, you creating pages to see how difficult it is within this industry. I would be more than happy to hear what you think it would take to do that? I'm all ears?
| 6:41 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Not a problem, PatrickDeese! I'm here to help. I just hope you can beat the cheaters. If so, more power to you!
| 6:51 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
> beat the cheaters
You are complaining about a company that has only two(!?!?!) results for a SERP.
I have seen searches where the top 120 results were owned by the same company (give or take 4 or 5 results).
There are tons of competitive niches, and this is not a spammy site.
If you really want to see some spam I can send you a list of search terms. ;)
| 7:12 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Just because it isn't as much spamming as the terms you are referring to that have 100+ results doesn't mean it isn't spam. Anytime you create a website for the sole purpose to gain more rankings, to increase PR, add false linking, etc. you are manipulating the SERP's - PERIOD. This is not difficult stuff folks. I never said that these were the worst spammers in the world, I just simply said they are spamming making the serp's like reliable for the searchers.
| 11:21 pm on Apr 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
JB, here is what you've done...
You've brought attention to the promotional products sites. I'm sure you are aware of the power this board has. Do you actually think Google would do anything to that network of sites? At this stage of the game? There are enough people viewing this topic that if anything were to happen to those sites, it may end being a PR nightmare for Google. I think your efforts will have a reverse effect.
By the way, the last time I checked, one of those sites went from 18,000 backlinks to 27,600 since you started this topic. Those sites are going to have a record sales week due to your diligent effort here and at other boards where you've posted.
| This 123 message thread spans 5 pages: < < 123 ( 1  3 4 5 ) > > |