robotsdobetter
msg:72307 | 11:26 pm on Apr 7, 2004 (gmt 0) |
| Is it the more the better |
|
If it from related sites it is better. | Suppose I make 10 links with anchor-texts like "dog-animal", "cat-animal", "goat-animal" etc. Does it count 10 times for the keyword "animal" |
|
It would count it ten times, but less weight would be given because their are other words in it. | And does it count for all the 10 different animals mentioned in these links? |
|
Yes it will.
|
powerofeyes
msg:72308 | 11:47 pm on Apr 7, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Backlinks and PR update in these data centres, I am seeing it live now in WWW. [66.102.7.98...]
[66.102.7.99...]
[66.102.7.99...] [216.239.37.98...]
[216.239.37.99...]
[216.239.37.102...]
|
weela
msg:72309 | 11:52 pm on Apr 7, 2004 (gmt 0) |
ditto, my home page just got a new PR rank
|
rfgdxm1
msg:72310 | 12:09 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
?! Good goddess! Both my site's home pages are PR7, including an internal page of PR7 I know has a number of solid backlinks. Could Google have rescaled PR such that PR is higher across the board? Dunno, but this would tend to explain why a few days ago one site of mine hit #1 on a SERP I've never been able to get before.
|
oaktown
msg:72311 | 12:17 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
This is beyond beleif. It's as like hundreds of backlinks (1,200) have just disappeared! anybody got an idea of what G's doing? My Homepage dropped from 7 to 5. and most of the surviving datacenters com up as 404.
|
rfgdxm1
msg:72312 | 12:21 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
From oaktown's post, I guess not every site has gone up in PR. :( One notable one that did is [dmoz.org....] PR10 again.
|
sid560
msg:72313 | 12:22 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Since this topic is backlinks... When trading links, sometimes the other party puts the back link to my site in a frame on their site. Will that count as a link? Or is that an undesirable way to have a backlink?
|
teeceo
msg:72314 | 12:42 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
"Will that count as a link? Or is that an undesirable way to have a backlink?" it "May" count depending on if the googlebot finds it. teeceo.
|
newwebster
msg:72315 | 12:59 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Backlink and pagerank update for me to! This happened sooner than I thought. I hope they are back on a monthly update of these factors.
|
CathyM
msg:72316 | 5:35 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
I am see fluctuations tonight between PR 4 and 5 for one of my sites, there must be some dancing going on.
|
kippie
msg:72317 | 6:11 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
What are these data centres Powerofeyes is mentioning like [216.239.37.99...] What are these doing? Kippie
|
sem4u
msg:72318 | 7:24 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
One of my new sites has gone from a 4 to a 5 :)
|
Natko
msg:72319 | 10:57 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
may I ask why I 'lost' about 90% of my backlinks?
Google doesn't 'see' or count them any more?!
|
tenerifejim
msg:72320 | 12:05 pm on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Natko, maybe 90% of back links have dropped below PR4. I have been down graded on two sites from 5 to 4 but on another 3 sites from 5 to 6. Two steps back....
|
Natko
msg:72321 | 2:21 pm on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
No, most of these are PR4 or above.
|
robotsdobetter
msg:72322 | 8:33 pm on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Maybe Google thinks they are not related to your site or they might have been seen as a link farm or something like that.
|
Natko
msg:72323 | 9:53 pm on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
No. Now are diversified to a page it links to, and no more all them to a home page. So I still have them all, but diversified.
|
|
