| 3:31 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Yes - it does.
| 3:52 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Do you know any site that use this method? And do you think this method is a good technique to get more PR?
| 7:29 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)|
well for one thing counters have _noscript_ tags that link back in their code. links are recognized. Its more a matter of placing spammy links, not just a deserved or worthwhile link.
do a query on google for link:http://extreme-dm.com/tracking/ and see what I mean.
| 7:38 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)|
wouldn't advise you to spam Google by putting hidden links in noscript. Sure an employee of Google got warned against the practice.
| 8:31 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)|
>And do you think this method is a good technique to get more PR?
No. But it is a good technique to start a Google-Bad-Neighborhood.
| 11:51 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)|
|hutcheson: "No. But it is a good technique to start a Google-Bad-Neighborhood." |
None of this is spam. In fact it makes my pages more accessible, so why would it make me a bad neighbourhood?
| 4:25 am on Mar 27, 2004 (gmt 0)|
These links do both get crawled & pass PR (from what I can tell).
I used them on my site for months when I had .js menu. I wouldn't bother using them to be deceptive, only use them if it makes sense i.e. for a .js alternative.