| 7:37 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
No, outgoing links leak PR that you could redirect to your own site. However, unless your strategy is to buy all links, likely it will be hard to get links if you refuse to link to others. And, remember the all important inbound link anchor text. Because of that, exchanging links almost always is good for your site.
| 7:41 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
external links wont boost your pr but it can boost your position in the serps especially if its like the one you mentioned to a high pr on topic site.
| 7:57 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
External links should not boost position in SERPs.
| 8:17 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|External links should not boost position in SERPs. |
I know that's what the PR alg is all about. But I have no idea why this single page shows higher PR than all the other pages. Maybe somebody linked to it. But who would link to an SEO page without asking for a backlink?
| 8:19 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>>External links should not boost position in SERPs
With all respect rfgdxm1 I disagree.There is evidence that "local rank" is in play .
| 8:35 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I've never seen any evidence of that cabbie. It doesn't make sense that just by adding links that my site should rank better. And, as you specifically claimed this is the case, the burden of proof is on you.
| 8:45 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>>the burden of proof is on you.
i have proved it to myself.I invite others to prove it to themselves by trying it.
Its not just by adding links but by adding a link to a site that is ranking well for the same term.
| 9:01 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>i have proved it to myself.I invite others to prove it to themselves by trying it.
And how do you know that this wasn't due to something else, including some general change in the Google algo? This is roughly equivalent to if I added a comma in a sentence on my home page, and my rank went up, arguing that adding commas improves ranking. Also note that adding a link will necessarily change the on page text, and that is one of the factors in ranking. Thus you could never be sure that it was the additional link that caused the improved ranking.
| 9:07 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
hehe.As i have said I am satisfied beyond reasonable doubt.Without taking more time than I have to explain why I invite others to try it for themselves.The thing is until something becomes a mainstream notion all else is speculative.
In 6 months this will be old news and people will have missed the boat.
| 10:18 pm on Oct 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
cabbie, it is hard to believe that is true.
If that is true, all you have to do is put 1,000 links on a page to high PR pages and your page would be #1 ranked.
I've got a win-win situation for anybody that wants to try this theory. I'll give you my site name and you can link to me. If the theory is right you win. But regardless I get alot of good incoming links and I don't have to give a reciprocal link. I like that deal.
| 12:20 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>cabbie, it is hard to believe that is true.
>If that is true, all you have to do is put 1,000 links on a page to high PR pages and your page would be #1 ranked.
Right. I'm not saying this isn't possible. None of us know what ideas they may cook up at the Googleplex. However, this idea doesn't make sense. If it were true, and it became common knowledge, people would be gaming Google by adding links to high PR sites just to get to the top of the SERPs.
| 1:07 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|Can outgoing links improve my pagerank? |
yes, if you're doing reciprocal with a better pr than you ;)
| 1:40 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>yes, if you're doing reciprocal with a better pr than you
Not necessarily so. If we swap links, and I add your URL to my "links" page, it is the other sites I link to that get less PR. My site doesn't "lose" PR by adding that link to you. However, I will pick up at least some extra PR from your link to me.
| 1:42 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
There is a way to test this theory. Create two identical pages with identical inbound links, a few unique (made up) words and a few small graphics. Now make the graphics on one page link to high PR pages. (I would suggest making one of them google.com.) Once the pages are indexed, search for the unique words and see which page comes up first.
To be certain, you will need to do this with several pages.
If 8 test pages work then the odds are 256:1 that the theory is correct. To make the pages slightly more identical, perhaps link one page to high PR sites and one to low PR sites. Perhaps also try a third page with links to non-existent sites.
| 1:56 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I also think outbound anchor text helps ranking. i.e. you link out to another on topic site using as anchor text the same phrase you are targetting, i.e. a text link (not an image with an alt tag).
I believe, that the PR leakage 'loss' is outweighed by the beneficial effect of the on page outbound anchor text - i.e. the page will rank higher - but obviously won't have a 'higher' PR
Is that what you actually did the_nerd?
| 2:16 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I thought there was no PR loss for the current page when linking out?
| 2:36 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I believe that outgoing links matter to some extent. I have a few pages that seem to be partially explained by this factor. One the reasons this wouldn't be true is that you could add 1000 outgoign links and be ranked #1, but this is true for anything.
I think outgoing links could be a factor just like H1's or something, where they matter, but obviously there's a limit. If you added 1000 outgoing links you should not be automatically #1, but having a few links ought to help as much as anything else you can write on a page.
| 2:43 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Its only 1 factor in the algo but i believe its a useful one.Its easy enough to prove to yourself.Just add a link to the site above you and see if you jump him.Thats providing your are already in the top 20.Otherwise link to one of the top 10 in your serps and see if you gain any
| 3:05 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>I thought there was no PR loss for the current page when linking out?
Correct. However, your site as a whole loses PR because the link on that page back to your site transfers less PR the more links to external sites that are on the page.
| 8:10 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I have been trying to figure out this outgoing link thing myself. Happenened to notice that one of my pages went down in ranking when I removed some outgoing links from the page. Could be of some other factor (like some people here mentioned) but Iīm not shure yet.
What I was thinking of is the "authority-hub" theory. Could linking to authority or high ranking sites within the same theme help your site? I have seen some sites using this technique - donīt know if it works, but at least some people do.
Would be nice if someone did test this.
Also discussed here:
P.S. Have you heard anything about affiliate links (afiliate tracking links) and that they could have a negative effect on your ranking? I see some logic behind this, but havenīt seen any comments about this...
| 8:27 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I agree with rfgdxm1
Also would suggest link to a site if you think it will benefit the end-user and its safe to do it with a redirect - e.g. [webmasterworld.com...]
| 8:43 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
instead of linking to a possible competitor another option is to link out to an appropriate directory page such as odp. It may also help to link to the odp pages where you have a listing (if applicable)
| 9:25 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|I believe, that the PR leakage 'loss' is outweighed by the beneficial effect of the on page outbound anchor text - i.e. the page will rank higher - but obviously won't have a 'higher' PR |
Is that what you actually did the_nerd?
No, I wasn't referring to ranking - just to toolbar PR. I just can't understand why one inner page should have the same PR as the home page and all other inner pages have one less.
The only explanation I could think of was the outgoing link to a PR 8 SEO site.
But maybe it's something totally different: before the last PR update only the homepage and the page with the outgoing link showed PR, all others where "too young" and had PR 0. Maybe it's a question of time? Slightly lower PR for a newer page? That could mean a page goes from 0 to n-1 to the real PR over time (yes, I know, toolbar PR is a log function..., just to keep it simpler)?
But probably it was just a nice guy linking to my page :) - and since it doesn't influence ranking, maybe we all should go back to work...
| 11:39 am on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I've said it before in other threads but I think it's worth repeating. The idea that an outward link is a waste of PR that could be used within the site (domain) is a THEORY - IT IS NOT FACT.
If Google treat internal and external links separately then outward links may have zero negative impact on internal PR. Just because the original (published) algo was page-orientated that is no reason to believe that the site (domain) does not feature in the current algos.
In any case, it is SERPS that count, not PR, and outward links (with keywords) may be considered beneficial. This is especially true with information sites.
| 1:45 pm on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Outbound text links with relevant keyword-rich anchor text and if possible, keyword rich outbound URL helps you a lot in the SERPs. It is one of the prime SEO techniques I use.
It does not leak your PR. Your PR is totally dependent on the incoming links to the page. It does reduce the amount of PR that you can recirculate to your other pages and sites.
I have not seen any evidence of the PR or quality of the target page affecting the ranking of the current page. However I do find it quite funny that many sites link to Google.com even when it is not relevant to the page in the expectation that google will favor them for this :-)
| 3:01 pm on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I operate an info site for an NFP org. I've seen no indication of any harm to PR or positioning by having a multitude of relevant outgoing links.
| 3:56 pm on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|why one inner page should have the same PR as the home page |
Another domain may be directly pointing to an inner page. You can check using alltheweb as they do not filter the link: results like Google does.
| 4:05 pm on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|It's a page linking to a very high PR site that is very much on topic. |
My experience is linking to a high PR site with your keywords in the anchor text definitely helps your position in the SERPS.
|It is one of the prime SEO techniques I use. |
It's also one of the oldest. I'm surprised this thread is producing varying responses.
| 4:20 pm on Oct 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|My experience is linking to a high PR site with your keywords in the anchor text definitely helps your position in the SERPS. |
TrillianJedi, do you think it is necessary to link to a high PR site? My experience says otherwise. Have you tested this?
| This 48 message thread spans 2 pages: 48 (  2 ) > > |