| 2:40 pm on Oct 2, 2003 (gmt 0)|
nice find :)
| 2:55 pm on Oct 2, 2003 (gmt 0)|
| 6:12 pm on Oct 2, 2003 (gmt 0)|
no juice in the interview
| 7:46 pm on Oct 2, 2003 (gmt 0)|
What's this "300 years" schtick?
| 8:38 pm on Oct 2, 2003 (gmt 0)|
A lot of the answers seem like they were crafted by the PR department.
I noticed my original link went to the second page of the article - it starts here: [insight.zdnet.co.uk...]
| 9:23 pm on Oct 2, 2003 (gmt 0)|
It's a typo. He really said 30 years. I think he was referring to the rumor that Googleplex will explode when the cookies expire.;)
|What's this "300 years" schtick? |
| 11:44 pm on Oct 2, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Nice find dude, but this was a ()*$#( of (*#@_ interview. Now how do I get the 10 min of my life back...LOL
| 2:26 am on Oct 3, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Hey, WS, don't say I didn't warn ya! ;)
| 4:01 am on Oct 3, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Funny typo in the homepage newsfeed:
|...another blurb about Googles fastasy engine of the future... |
Google's already a FASTasy lol, I think you meant fantasy? ;)
| 4:22 am on Oct 3, 2003 (gmt 0)|
spelling mistakes are common... lol.
But I see that Fastasy is somewhat near to Fantasy , but the s is no way near to the n but who cares, everybody who reads it can understand that its a spelling mistake and its really fantasy
| 8:39 am on Oct 3, 2003 (gmt 0)|
speaking of typing errors, try some common mistypings of verisign in your address-bar.;)
When you find it you might not notice.