| 4:00 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>ekkk, my DMOZ info is missing, ekkkkkkk ekkkkkkkkk
>The spam i am seeing, is the same site showing up for 80 of 100 SERPS,
>using different subdomains of the form city.domain.com all crosslinked
Wow, these are really fundamental analyzes. Thanks for sharing!
| 6:11 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)|
How often does Google update backlinks?
| 6:30 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)|
So are these backlink additions on CW just a tease or what? Usually by now they start rolling into other datacenters and flirt with the main idex occasionally...causing serps to move about wildly. This has been such a slow weekend.
| 6:53 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)|
What I SEE -
the effect of the backlinks to the SERPS has been sorted out 1-2 weeks ago. As many has been talking and agreeing. So what you see now doesn't affect the SERPs. Except SERPs of link:yourdomain.com. haha
| 7:33 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Yidaki i passed on the link farm to you. Its been around since before march and has been growing since then. I've reported it to google several times now,with no effect.. There are now over 1000 interlinked domains in the link farm.
| 7:45 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>Yidaki i passed on the link farm to you.
I'm not the person who has to judge about such.
Might help you: i've been also paralyzed in the past about competitors that gained positions above mine using techniques i called "spam". It'll regulate itself - believe me!
| 8:39 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)|
So is this considered an actual update [webmasterworld.com]?
| 9:19 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Well, something is happening...
CW has new backlinks (a modest increase that's still way behind the times) - ok this has been the case for a few days.
But, no update on the other DCs yet - as far as I can tell.
And yet, when I perform the same backlink check on google.co.uk I get a "Your search - link:*url* - did not match any documents." (?!)
So what's going on?
| 9:36 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)|
www-in has now also updated backlinks
| 7:53 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|www-in has now also updated backlinks |
Perhaps it has yours, but it doesn't have mine!
Although the SERPS in www-in are reflecting our climb on Saturday.
More evidence of a rolling update......
| 8:00 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
it has mine and yahoo's so I assumed it has it for anyone :)
| 8:26 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Doesn't have mine either! Only CW showing change so far. New PR evident on .35 only too
| 8:32 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
ahh, changed back to 799.000 was yesterday on 1.100.000
well that's part of the dance I suppose =P
| 9:45 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
On www, www2, and www3 the Yahoo backlinks are at 799.000.
Datacenters right this moment:
Have anyone observed lasting changes outside of cw sofar?
| 9:57 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I jumped to No.6 after I guess a recent PR8 link was picked up in the continuous crawl, and now these 2-3-month-old backlinks come in and I'm back down to 30 again. Come back freshbot, you seem to be the guy that counts now.
| 9:58 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Data center www-in is alternating between 799,000 and 1,100,000 backlinks for Yahoo and very slow (2.4 second for a search). Few days ago I saw on www-gv also '1,100,000' for backlinks on Yahoo, but now there is a time-out.
|Made In Sheffield|
| 10:12 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Yep got different Toolbar PR and backlinks from -cw.
| 10:58 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Backwards links seem to have been stuck for quite some time now.
I get the correct amount of about 5000+ Using all the other methods (that I know of) I get 119 or 145
What is going on. Simple speak please, I'm simple :o)
| 3:18 pm on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
1,100,000 on www
799,000 on www2
799,000 on www3
looks like its jumped the queue!
| 3:24 pm on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Is it still a fact that only pages with a PR of minumum 4 will count when you check backlinks?
My site went from 1,300 links 3 months ago to just 33 links and have not moved one bit the past 2 months :-(
| 3:29 pm on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>Is it still a fact that only pages with a PR of minumum 4 will count when you check backlinks?<
No, but then again toolbar PR values are questionable at best.
| 3:33 pm on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
i dontknow if this was already posted but i jsut checked 3 of my main keywords with millions of results on www and on 2 of them there is new number 1 - that is PDF document! huh? how is this posssible?
| 4:14 pm on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Maybe I'm dense, but is there any reason a PDF document shouldn't rank well? If it is on-topic then what makes it any different from an HTML page? I must be missing something.
| 11:31 am on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)|
My apologies if this has been mentioned already...
As of this morning, I am seeing the new PageRank via the Toolbar on the *real* toolbar data center (unmodified hosts file).
| 12:20 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)|
me too...new page rank has been officially published.
Interestingly, Alexa backlinks haven't changed.
| 12:32 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)|
The data center www-ab shows now also 1,100,000 backlinks for Yahoo.
- gv (gives time-out except for 188.8.131.52/99/104/105)
| 12:50 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I like posts like Takagi because it keeps me up to date.
> As of this morning, I am seeing the new PageRank via the Toolbar on the *real* toolbar data center (unmodified hosts file).
swerve, you might get back to an old PR. Whether the New or Old PR your are getting depends on which datacenters you are being redirected to. So this morning you are redirected to an updated server. Someone else might be redirected to an old server. It is random and it is how google works. (some kind of load balancing)
| 1:19 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>>me too...new page rank has been officially published.
No it hasn't. It's still in flux on www at least for my site and most likely others as well.
I get different backlink results just switching between browsers or operating systems or different times of the day. This is all just using www, not the other data centers.
| 1:44 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|This is all just using www, not the other data centers. |
Getting a page from www means getting data from ab, in, cw, ex, va, dc, or fi. And every time you send another or the same query, the result might come from another data center then the previous one. There is no data center called 'www'. See it as a helpdesk with one official telephone number, and 8 operators. If you call that help desk with the official number (www), you can get one of them on the phone. And next time you might end up with another one. Unless you dial a direct line (one specific data center).
| 8:53 am on Aug 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Recently I have spent much effort on obtaining quality links to my site. Google finally realized this and deep crawled my site and index my pages.
However, it still does not show the backlinks to my site. The pages that links to my site are of PR3 to PR9. Is it because google hasn't yet updated those pages?
FYI, it hasn't been that long that google indexed my site. It has been around 1 week.
| 2:38 am on Aug 12, 2003 (gmt 0)|
It is hard to say when GG will get to showing your back links. Conventional thinking would suggest that you must wait for the next update. Updates used to happen approximately once every month. After the last "update", something has changed. No one can say for sure how and when your back links will come in. At this time, some of the data centers are showing more back links for some sites. Maybe this is an indication that some sort of update is right around the corner.
Hang in there.
| This 214 message thread spans 8 pages: < < 214 ( 1 2 3 4 5  7 8 ) > > |