homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.227.141.230
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Subscribe and Support WebmasterWorld
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google News Archive
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Google News Archive Forum

    
Google description
Will i be banned for using scripts for this
Richie




msg:142378
 9:56 am on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

I'm in the top 10 in google for most of the usual search phrases for the topic of my web site.

That's good but the description google provides is often the first line on the page, and it's the same text for every page because it's advertisment text. The page is split into columns. The left column is for advertisments, middle the actual content, and the right just some navigation. I always use text for advertisments instead of banners because it looks nicer and text links get more click throughs in comparison.

I'd like to use PHP to check if google is the visitor and if so just display the first paragraph of the actual content of the page at the very top of the page.

Is that ok or will google be likely to ban the site for it or something?

 

Paul in South Africa




msg:142379
 10:19 am on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

IMO Google could view this as an attempt to serve up different content to them as opposed to visitors and could possibly result in a ban. ht*p://www.google.com/webmasters/faq.html

AndyCyberAVS




msg:142380
 10:38 am on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

You could try playing with your tables,

If you have your ads down the left, have a blank cell at the top, and then in the second cell across have you main body text, then have your ads in the next row down, but so that the ads don't appear at the bottom of the page only, your main body text cell should be rowspan="2"..

This sould make the SE's think that the body text is first on the page, which it is...

Hope that this helps..

Andy

JasonIR




msg:142381
 11:31 am on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

Richie, that's cloaking and could result in a ban.

digitalghost




msg:142382
 11:35 am on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

Or you could use the table trick:

[delorie.com...]

Same trick explained better: [apromotionguide.com...]

Or you can go with a three column layout and CSS:

[webmasterworld.com...]

nell




msg:142383
 11:55 am on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

You can use JavaScript (document.write) for anything you want to exclude from the spiders.

Richie




msg:142384
 12:18 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

I can't be bothered changing the table structure or using JS because some users may have it disabled.

Google should use the page meta description imo >:

Jon_King




msg:142385
 12:39 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

No offence meant, but then you can't be bothered with high rankings in Google.

madweb




msg:142386
 12:55 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

Well, you *can* force google to display your meta description by not allowing googlebot to cache your page (hence preventing it from 'snippeting')

<META NAME="GOOGLEBOT" CONTENT="NOARCHIVE">

This may or may not have detremental affect on SERPs, from trying to search and browse here no-one seems to really know.

nell




msg:142387
 4:13 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

>using JS because some users may have it disabled

For those users, include <noscript> tags to put in your menu </noscript>

Mike12345




msg:142388
 4:21 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

<META NAME="GOOGLEBOT" CONTENT="NOARCHIVE">

I use this on a couple fo sites its good is your metas are upto sratch and your content is rubbish ;)

Richie




msg:142389
 4:32 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

madweb, do you mean '<META NAME="GOOGLEBOT" CONTENT="NOSNIPPET">'? I have put them both in.

Thanks for all your suggestions.

Mike12345




msg:142390
 4:37 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

Oops, i miss read that, noarchive prevents cachin. lol! nosnippet is the badger yer after.

vincevincevince




msg:142391
 4:48 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

use absolutely positioned DIV

that way you put your content div first in the output
then the left div, then the right div
as google parses the page, it hits content first
as users see the page, they see it how it normally is

John_Creed




msg:142392
 4:56 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

You already stated that you have good placement. The wise thing would be to leave it the way it is.

Why mess with a good thing?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google News Archive
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved