homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.97.242
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google News Archive
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Google News Archive Forum

    
Will Google Index CGI URLs?
adisakmai

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 2:25 am on May 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

Hi

Will google index shopping card system that is using CGI?

[edit]
Many Thank

[edited by: rcjordan at 2:34 am (utc) on May 3, 2003]
[edit reason] sorry, no specific references to sites. [/edit]

 

Jesse_Smith

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 2:41 am on May 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

It depends on how simple the URL is. I have much more success with php than cgi.

maccas

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 3:15 am on May 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

sure [google.com]

vnsampat

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 6:46 pm on May 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

I have had google picking up cgi on 1 of my websites.
But its better with asp and php.

loverty

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 6:52 pm on May 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

right ,i agree with you.php better than cgi

mcavic

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 6:55 pm on May 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

I agree that PHP is better, but I don't know why an SE would think so. As far as the browser is concerned, PHP and CGI are the same thing, just with different extensions.

brummie

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 7:25 pm on May 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

Google only started to give page rank to CGI pages in the last few months.

Php and asp have been asigned page rank for as long as I can remember.

GoogleGuy

WebmasterWorld Senior Member googleguy us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 1:25 am on May 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

We don't care what the file extension is. Well, don't make it .exe. :) But there's no boost for .php vs. .cgi vs. .asp vs. whatever.. :)

Jesse_Smith

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 1:51 am on May 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

:::But there's no boost for .php vs. .cgi vs. .asp vs. whatever.

That's weird. With a php message board, after I dumped the session IDs, BANG, indexed the site.

php= Main page --> Message board indexes --> Page 2 --> and so on, all get's indexed.

But on .cgi I don't see it get deepcrawled very far in.

cgi= Main page --> section index --> item page. Only goes two pages deep, to section index.

Are these bad cgi URLs?

Section: name.cgi?mode=videogames&id=541022
Item: name.cgi?item=B000084318&type=Search

I put them in .shtml using SSI to get them listed.

mcavic

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 4:06 am on May 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

The id= might be bad.

GoogleGuy

WebmasterWorld Senior Member googleguy us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 5:55 am on May 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

"id=" can look like a session id. I'd avoid session id's in any form if you can..

But there's no boost for different file types.

ciml

WebmasterWorld Senior Member ciml us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 12500 posted 2:44 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

No boost, but some URL extensions don't seem to get crawled.

The 'normal' ones do, but domain.com/file.somethingunusual won't get in by virtue of returning text/html as the Content-type.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google News Archive
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved