homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.18.74
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google News Archive
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Google News Archive Forum

    
Trading Links
Am I losing out?
mmr82




msg:168191
 3:24 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

Am I losing out by rejecting to trade links with pages that has PR less than 3 and pages that doesn't belong to the nature of my website?

Mohamed

 

BGumble




msg:168192
 3:27 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

I wouldn't do it with pages that aren't relevant to your theme. If linking page relevance isn't used in the algo now, it will be at some point in the future.

ircgeeks




msg:168193
 3:46 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

I donít use the pages page rank on my decision on a link I consider the content. A PR3 could be a PR5 next month. If a person is actively working on getting links your not the only person he is hitting up.

rfgdxm1




msg:168194
 4:30 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

>I wouldn't do it with pages that aren't relevant to your theme. If linking page relevance isn't used in the algo now, it will be at some point in the future.

I wouldn't worry about this. To start, Google doesn't do this now, and in the unlikely event they ever do, *then* worry about it. I question whether Google will ever do this, primarily due to it being computationally intense, and also any such algo would likely have many false hits. Also, if Google ever did this I doubt they'd lower the rank of the linking page. It would make more sense just to assign less value to irrelevant links.

As for the original poster, since this link is off topic and irrelvant to users of your site, I can't see doing this unless you expect that it will somehow improve your site ranking. Only way I can see this likely happening is if you add a link to his site on your links page that already has 70 links, and one more makes little difference. And, if you could get this other site to link to you with just the right anchor text.

Zapatista




msg:168195
 4:47 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

My 2 cents, I usually reject anything under a 3 unless it is dead on theme related.

I also reject 4s and 5s with more than 100 links tho. Nothing I hate to see more than a page with 100 links with 5 different themes on one page. I don't care if it is a PR4 or 5. I would rather get a theme related PR 2 link with only 3 other links on the page. 100 links is nasty looking and violates Google's recommendations for webmasters.

I am of the opinion that when you give more, you get more. A pr4 with 100 links of 5 diff themes doesn't offer squat.

whatson




msg:168196
 5:19 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

Yeah, I dont exchange links with sites that have lots of links on them.

Marcia




msg:168197
 5:45 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

>>I wouldn't do it with pages that aren't relevant to your theme.

Can't help but agree; what's there to gain if they're off topic and less than PR3? If it's a site that looks like it's got good PR potential, that might be some justification, but it isn't really adding anything - especially terms of value to site visitors.

>>If linking page relevance isn't used in the algo now, it will be at some point in the future.

Highlight that with a yellow marker.

vitaplease




msg:168198
 6:01 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

In the beginning in a fling of natural linking ambition I did trade links with non-themed sites.

I have long since stopped that. It just feels cheap and unprofessional to possibly lead visitors to unrelated or low quality resources (low quality having nothing to do with PR).

BGumble




msg:168199
 6:03 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

>>I question whether Google will ever do this, primarily due to it being computationally intense,

And we'll never need more than 640k to do it. :)

>>Also, if Google ever did this I doubt they'd lower the rank of the linking page. It would make more sense just to assign less value to irrelevant links.

Agreed.

NGene




msg:168200
 11:26 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

It just feels cheap and unprofessional to possibly lead visitors to unrelated or low quality resources (low quality having nothing to do with PR).

I'd highlight *that* with a yellow marker. :)

brotherhood of LAN




msg:168201
 11:34 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

>>rejecting to trade links with pages that has PR less than 3

Just wondering, do you say 3 just because they don't show as backlinks? I wouldn't worry if that is the case. If it's your typical informational site and your linking to related resources I'd have no problem linking to a PR2 or 1.

I'd bank on more informational sites being less SEO'd than e-com sites, sometimes a page has low PR because the internal linking is not as savvy as yours. If PR was the decider, I'd link to it anyway. If it's a strict recip, you;d have to wonder how "on topic" these recips are ;)

johannes




msg:168202
 11:35 am on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

I agree with ircgeeks.

If someone offer you to trade links, there's obviously someone working with the site. You should look at the site's quality and what history it has. If it's a really good site, their pagerank can rise very fast. And when it is a pr 7 site, they wont bother trading links with you any more...

Zapatista




msg:168203
 1:07 pm on Apr 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

One can discount non theme related links to a point but if they bring traffic, what's the harm? I don't think non theme related links is going to hurt me. My goal now is to diversify traffic away from Google dependency.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google News Archive
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved