homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.161.192.130
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google News Archive
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Google News Archive Forum

    
Deep linking vs. Frontdoor Linking, Aliases vs. actual URLs
Costs vs. Benefits in 2003
Eris Discordia

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11173 posted 9:41 am on Apr 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

Hello all,

I'm sure this has been discussed quite a bit in the past, but I'm not sure where to look, and also the costs and benefits of most things in SEO change over time.

So...

I am not an SEO specialist, but I've been asked to do SEO for my company. We write red and blue software (our dark horse), and our red software is currently divided into square software (the company's intendeed hot new product), round software (slowly aging cash cow), and pointy software (lagging along).

1.
What would bring us more benefits and less loss: focussing inbound links on the frontdoor (listing say the square and round software and the "red" keyword), or on the product pages?

(We currently work without a set strategy here. FD is at 6 PR, product pages at 4 PR, most negotiated inbound links are aimed at product pages.)

2.
What would bring us more benefits and less loss: inbound links pointing to aliases prod1name.company.com, p2n.company.com, p3n.company.com, etc. (for the viral marketing effect/user-friendliness effect), or www.company.com/p1n etc. (for the inbound link focussing effect)?

(We currently work without a set strategy here. Most negotiated links are at aliases.)

Thanks for your opinions and debate!

Eris D

 

Eris Discordia

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11173 posted 6:45 pm on Apr 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

Hi,

Come on, this question can't be THAT boring... :-)

Eris

dwilson

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11173 posted 6:53 pm on Apr 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

From what I've read here, subdomains are counted seperately from the www domain, so they don't boost the main domain's PR like you would hope. Then again, PR is only PR, not results. If you can get to the same content through prod1.company.com as www.company.com/prod1 then Google may assess some kind of duplicate content penalty. That's been discussed here before.

What do you want visitors to see first? The company's front door or the products? That's a question for your marketing department & would dictate the links you request. Personally, I am a fan of deep linking, but I'm probably in the minority on that.

WebGuerrilla

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11173 posted 7:18 pm on Apr 3, 2003 (gmt 0)


The decision to use or not to use subdomains should be based completely on what would be best for users. There was a time in the past when there were some definite benefits of using subdomains, but that has changed over the last few months.

Now, they are really no different than a separate domain. And from a linking/PR standpoint, the structure of the url doesn't matter.

freejung

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11173 posted 9:12 pm on Apr 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

Dwilson, I don't think that's right. I think that any page which links to your page counts for the same PR regardless of whether it's on the same domain, another domain, or a subdomain, so it doesn't matter.

I too am a fan of deep links. I think they're a good idea as they boost the PR of that specific subpage and you get the keyword bonus for the anchor text (if they use the right keywords to link to you). Plus the main page will also get PR benefit if the subpages link to it. So I favor deep links, but I can see reasons why you would want the customer to always land on your index, branding for instance.

No matter where the customer lands, though, it should always be immediately clear what the site is about and where they are in it, if at all possible.

freejung

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11173 posted 9:14 pm on Apr 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

Oh, BTW, welcome to ww Eris Discordia, cool handle. Hail Eris!

Eris Discordia

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11173 posted 4:03 pm on Apr 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

So the consensus seems to be that, unless marketing issues make deep linking bad, there's no reason not to do it. OK - our site is branded on every page, and most every part is accessible from every other part (through DHTML menus, I believe), so it seems I shouldn't worry about this.

What about the aliases? I seem to remember reading here that having links divided among www.company.com/p1n and p1n.company.com could dilute the advantage of incoming links. Is this true? Does it outweigh the benefit of an easy-to-remember, easy-to-update link? (Easy to update as in a site restructuring is less likely to break the aliased link than one reflecting the old site structure.)

Erik

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google News Archive
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved