|Synergising between domain names|
| 2:36 am on Feb 21, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I own two domain names that relate to the same industry:
2) Memorable Domain Name .com
The first consists of keywords that are very frequently searched as a pair in Google (e.g. "buying widgets"); the second one is catchy and relevant but would never be typed in as a search term.
My question is: which domain should I use for the development of a website?
Should I use both and if so, what strategy should I adopt?
The memorable domain is beautiful and the website I am developing is close to my heart, and yet at the same time I do not want to miss out on the traffic that can potentially be generated by the presence of the powerful keyword pair in the other domain. How can I synergize between them?
If it is of any help, I foresee search engine-generated traffic being dominant in the first year, with loyalty and brand recognition taking over in the future (no direct type-ins expected for either domain). I am in the pre-launch stage and have prepared some high-quality, search engine-optimised content.
I look forward to your suggestions.
[edited by: Webwork at 5:03 am (utc) on Feb. 21, 2006]
[edit reason] Charter [webmasterworld.com] [/edit]
| 5:09 am on Feb 21, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Hello Lysander and welcome to WebmasterWorld.
Your dilema is a common one: Brand vs Keyword.
If your work is going to be a work of heart and likely to be valued by many then you have your choice - as it's the content that will matter - but in the scenario you describe I would lean towards the more original memorable made-up word. Why? Because it all hangs together, if you know what I mean.
You can still develop a related site at keyword-keyword and build it as a traffic feeder.
Just remember: Don't build a business plan based upon search engine love. Build a website people will love/value and let the traffic build naturally from links. Let the search engines get it right or wrong based upon many peoole linking to you. Hopefully they'll get it right, but you'll always have that link traffic and link traffic tends to grow exponentially.
| 2:49 pm on Feb 21, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Many thanks for the welcome and advice, Webwork. I have great confidence in the value that the website will provide for visitors and I feel that it therefore deserves its unique name, as you argued in your post.
I have a question: will Google get upset if I develop www.keyword1-keyword2.com with a single page of content that, with contextual links, leads to several pages of the main website? This is to make the most of the www.keyword1-keyword2.com domain as a traffic feeder, as you suggested. Does Google frown on such practices?
| 3:36 pm on Feb 21, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Google might not frown on that directly, but why would anyone link to a feeder site like that when they could link directly to the main site? Unless you have some real content on the site it would tough to take it very far, promotion-wise.
Set it up to make sure your bases are covered, but spend your main energy developing your main site.
| 6:38 pm on Feb 21, 2006 (gmt 0)|
You're absolutely right - I would not expect people to link to the feeder site.
The significance of the feeder site is that if people do a Google search of "keyword1 keyword2" and find the www.keyword1-keyword2.com site, I want to direct them to the main website. I want to make the most of the SEO value that is intrinsic to hyphenated keyword domain names.
I say that because I have noticed that Google seems to give a high priority to domains that have the keyword you searched in them, even when the pages themselves have very little text and are definitely not search engine-optimised. I am under the impression that having hyphenated domains with keywords gives you a significant head start with search engine results, but it does mean that you have to sacrifice the prestige associated with a branded name. I will try and benefit from both if I possibly can.
Perhaps I am optimistic in assuming that Google will give it a decent priority, but I have a strong feeling that the www.keyword1-keyword2.com domain will come in very useful in some way or another. I suspect I might create an original and incredibly useful page of content that is unique to that domain.
All in all, I agree with Webwork that outstanding content breeds a large user base, and that loyal users will never betray you, whereas relying on search engines is all a bit hit-and-miss.
| 7:18 pm on Feb 21, 2006 (gmt 0)|
|I am under the impression that having hyphenated domains with keywords gives you a significant head start with search engine results |
I'd say it can give a small head start but be realistic in your expectations. I have a site whose domain name is in the format "three-blind-mice.com". It's a phrase commonly used in the industry, not just keywords strung together. The site has some respectable rankings at the moment, but it took a year to get to the front page for "three blind mice". The domain name on its own was not enough to give a competitive advantage until I'd done a bunch of other things right as well (a lot of tightly themed link development).
| 1:50 am on Feb 22, 2006 (gmt 0)|
|You can still develop a related site at keyword-keyword and build it as a traffic feeder |
It could be articles, reviews, a blog about the product etc...
| 12:06 am on Feb 24, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Lysander. Why not simply do a 301 redirect from your keyword-keyword.com domain to your preferred brandable name. That way you enjoy the type-in traffic that your keyword domain has, to your preferred brandable name. In time, some of those type-ins will be converted to your brandable name. However, always to remember, content is king.
| 2:59 am on Feb 25, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Hyphenated multi-keyword domains look very spammy to me... whenever I clean out the spam crud from my site's guestbook, it's usually full to the brim with them, so they give me a bad taste in my mouth.