| 11:01 am on Feb 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I think that in this particular case that might be a good option. The domain you consider to choose appears relevant and good - looking in contrast to any experimenting with hyphens (which I personally dislike) or long names, etc.
| 5:07 pm on Feb 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
datacompression.info is worth checking out, I think it was sold to a traffic firm so development has ceased but it still gets around 30 - 40,000 vistors a month.
There are getting to be some nice .info's
Governments deparments like them too
| 4:35 am on Feb 13, 2006 (gmt 0)|
IMHO the average surfer equates "website" with "com". org and net are in the back of their minds somewhere as a "different type of website" and info just isn't anywhere at all.
Don't let this stop you from developing an info though. I really believe that long-term, info will be a very viable TLD, second only to com. It's just a matter of developing public awareness of info as a valid TLD.
| 6:32 am on Feb 13, 2006 (gmt 0)|
If it's the traffic you worry about, I can tell you that a .info of mine is currently getting close to one million PV per month. --I actually own the .com as well, but since it's a heavily information-oriented site, I thought the .info was more appropriate! :-)
<added>The site is in a language other than English.</added>
| 8:39 am on Feb 13, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I think in many ways it does not matter.. if it's searched and comes up with the relevent info, I don't suppose anyone cares..
I suspect there would be few type in though..
| 9:23 pm on Feb 13, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I would go ahead with the non hyphenated form of .info, because as it has been pointed out by others, .info recognition will increase. Furthermore, if your site is purely informational, then it is logical to use that TLD.
A few weeks ago I saw a TV ad for Peru.info, so it is little by little entering mainstream.
| 9:57 pm on Feb 14, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Hyphens aren't good. Sounds like the .info will be best.
| 3:59 am on Feb 18, 2006 (gmt 0)|
thanks guys. i've purchased the .info domain :). and lobo, thanks for the reality check. it actually never really occurred to me at least 90% of my expected traffic should come from search, in which case the domain suffix really doesn't matter.
sounds like .info is the best here.
| 2:53 am on Feb 25, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Good choice... since you say it's a noncommercial, informational site, a .com domain would clearly not make logical sense anyway.