homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.163.139.36
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Cloaking
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Cloaking Forum

    
A Way Around IP Based Cloaking
seth_wilde

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 9 posted 10:26 pm on Jun 8, 2000 (gmt 0)

Here's some interesting articles on how to use AV's Bablefish to get around cloaking (basically when you translate a page with bablefish you're requesting the page with an AV IP address which allows you to beat the cloaking)

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/000511/ca_web_gue_1.html

http://pagejacking.webguerrilla.com/

 

fantomaster

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 9 posted 1:39 am on Jun 9, 2000 (gmt 0)

This is dumb cloaking, serves 'em right they got caught out - if you're working with IP delivery, simply don't feed cloaked pages to Babelfish spiders, i.e. exclude their IPs from the process, e.g. by commenting them out in your engine list (or by not putting them in there in the first place).

Brett_Tabke

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 9 posted 7:13 am on Jun 9, 2000 (gmt 0)

That trick is what, two years old? Surprising how many cloaked sites it can still work on. It worked on this mega site earlier this spring.

seth_wilde

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 9 posted 4:25 pm on Jun 9, 2000 (gmt 0)

I hadn't seen this trick before but I knew that if I posted it hear I would get a reaction of fanto The solution to this problem was pretty obvious, I was just suprised that such high profile clients were involved. You would think that etoys would be a little more selective about who did their SEO.

fantomaster

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 9 posted 1:43 am on Jun 10, 2000 (gmt 0)

seth: From what we have seen to date even on VERY major sites, the SEO situation is pathetic, to put it very mildly.
We lost all but one page of a client's site (no small player) on AV recently because the SEO people before us had stuffed it with machine generated doorway pages of the very worst kind, white text on white background, spamdexing, absolutely no content and a revisit-after meta tag set to 2 days. Not that the latter is of too much import, but it does boil down to asking for it. When we took over, I omitted to check out the existing doorway pages (they're still ranking pretty well on some engines) - not a mistake I'll care to make again.
In any case, major companies' overall SEO is really a salesman's job: most CEOs just won't be bothered with the gory technical details, and even if you get good to excellent results, more often than not you're well advised to let your salespeople sell those again to them because they neither understand the whole process from scratch nor to they want to. So it's a mix of ignorance, carelessness, overblown ego ("why can't you simply tweak those pages to put us in position #1 tomorrow?"), overworkedness and a general aversion to "all this search engine voodoo stuff" ...

backus

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 9 posted 1:43 pm on Jun 29, 2000 (gmt 0)

I don't know if it is true, but I've heard that most search engines are going to use the IP address in place of the domain name to place sites. So those who spent a load of money to get a domain with keywords in the name, wasted their time? Tell me it isn't so?

this post is worth a new thread [webmasterworld.com] --rcj

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Cloaking
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved