| 5:55 am on Feb 18, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Thanks for the heads up. :)
| 3:52 pm on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)|
I'm seeing sites getting decloaked in major categories
| 6:25 pm on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Maybe I shouldn't have said anything ;) haha
| 6:11 am on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)|
I posted it in the yahoo forum earlier too. Doh!
| 6:09 am on Mar 7, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Yahoo's cache is not picking up cloaked pages the same way Google's cache does, so I wouldnt be all that worried.
| 3:31 pm on Mar 9, 2004 (gmt 0)|
What do you mean, Kirby?
| 3:37 pm on Mar 10, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Man, it's pretty rough being a newbie who thought he new a little about what he's doing for his clients particularly when I come along a post like those above.
Question: I hear from a guru in Denver that SERP's are ingnoring Meta tags. Then I read this thread, however, I'm not clear whether that is true, and further, whether to use the tag being discussed for better placement.
Questions: I am also very eager to hear what you guys think about cloaking. Seems too good to be true.
Thanks in advance.
| 4:05 pm on Mar 10, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Some SEs ignore tha meta title and description tags because they're so prone to abuse, but most will respect the meta robots tag, which isn't used for optimization as such.
| 4:35 pm on Mar 10, 2004 (gmt 0)|
The meta keywords tag is ignored by almost all search engines. A couple of engines will pick up the meta description tag and use it to describe a website (the text under the title in the SERP). Few engines actually index text from the meta description tag.
|Questions: I am also very eager to hear what you guys think about cloaking. Seems too good to be true. |
Well, from my past posts, it's pretty obvious that I'm a cloaker. I wouldn't do it if it didn't work. However, as with all aggressive SEO techniques, it can be risky. It is wise to isolate your cloaking to separate domains, on different web hosts, from your primary domain.
| 9:53 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)|
and even on seperate domains it's even safer to do it as a hybrid have some pages visible and some pages complete cloaks
| 4:35 pm on Mar 25, 2004 (gmt 0)|
So how about a "nosnippets" tag? Does anyone know if Yahoo! has one yet?