Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 188.8.131.52 , register , free tools , login , search , pro membership , help , library , announcements , recent posts , open posts Become a Pro Member
typo cloaking cloaking keyword misspellings kylo msg:679297 12:19 am on Nov 20, 2003 (gmt 0) Hi all, I've been lurking around WW for awhile, finally got around to posting.
Anyway...onto my topic.
My company sells blue widgets. While I was whipping up some content today, I accidentally typed "blue wdigets". I hopped over to overture to check out the search count for "blue wdigets" and found that there were a respectable amount of searches, enough to merit targeting the term.
If I were to cloak the "blue wdigets" term within my content when the spiders come crawling, is there is a high likelihood of being penalized?
DaveAtIFG msg:679298 3:46 pm on Nov 20, 2003 (gmt 0)
It sounds as if you're planning to use hidden links, not cloaking [ webmasterworld.com]. Google frowns [ google.com] on either technique, as do most leading SEs.
If you're in a highly competitive market, it's quite likely a competitor will report you and you will enjoy a penalty.
Most major SEs now suggest spelling corrections as part of their algo so the volume of "misspelling traffic" has declined substantially. For me, the risk just doesn't justify the reward.
kylo msg:679299 8:52 pm on Nov 20, 2003 (gmt 0)
Actually, I was planning on using IP/User Agent vars with a little PHP to feed it to the spiders, inline with the rest of the paragraph ie "My company's blue?php typo_function();? blah blah blah".
I rank well for the proper spelling, but many of my customers aren't, shall I say, the sharpest tools in the shed.
The market doesn't have a large competitive web presence,I'm more worried about a bot sending a different user agent type and seeing the one word discrepancy and issuing a penalty based on that.