homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.205.144.54
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Cloaking
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Cloaking Forum

    
Cloaking with Google?
johnhamman




msg:679000
 11:49 pm on Apr 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

Ok heres the question? What about cloaking google? Im confused about how to do that because of how they cache? Can someone fill me in on this?
john

 

oilman




msg:679001
 11:52 pm on Apr 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

cloak like you would for anyone else and include the infamous NOARCHIVE tag on the page you're serving to Google.

mdharrold




msg:679002
 11:58 pm on Apr 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

If you are cloaking because your content is dynamic, is the tag really needed?
If you are cloaking for design, doesn't the tag give it away?

Air




msg:679003
 12:23 am on Apr 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

>doesn't the tag give it away?

Not really, because many sites with dynamic content and no cloaking will also use the noarchive tag to avoid having stale content captured.

Personally I haven't experienced much difference with or without the tag, so most often choose to prevent Google from caching.

jrap




msg:679004
 3:48 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

Hello.
I am new to this Cloaking idea, and I just have a question. How could Google detect a cloaked page if it had something like:

PHP CODE:
<?
if(preg_match("/MSIE/i",$HTTP_USER_AGENT)) header("Location: www.widgets.com");
?>

So the code would detect if the user had an IE browser, and if so, forward them to another URL. Could Google detect this, and if so, they would penalize the site correct?

(edited by: jrap at 4:05 am (utc) on May 26, 2002)

Air




msg:679005
 4:03 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

>Could Google detect this, and if so, they would penalize the site correct?

Using redirection is not a good idea, most likely it will be penalized or it will be handled badly (i.e. wrong page indexed).

True cloaking does not return any redirect code(that's how search engines detect redirects), it simply delivers the page to the requesting entity, usually by server side code.

jrap




msg:679006
 4:08 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

The short code snippet I posted is in PHP (..should have specified, sorry) which is server side. Basically that code would be executed before any other headers are sent out.

Air




msg:679007
 4:16 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

Yes I spotted the PHP, but "header("Location: www.widgets.com"); " sets the redirect code, that's what I was cautioning against.

jrap




msg:679008
 4:18 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

Air, ah, I see. Thanks for the response thus far.

How would google notice the redirect if the code only executes if the browser is IE?

Air




msg:679009
 4:22 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

>How would google notice the redirect if the code only executes if the browser is IE?

The people that get redirected will tell them ... especially if you outrank them.

digitalghost




msg:679010
 4:28 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

>>The people that get redirected will tell them

Bingo. The people that are getting busted cloaking are getting turned in by their competitors. Competitive markets ensure it.

Cloaking needs to be imperceptible to the engines, AND human viewers.

DG

johnhamman




msg:679011
 5:03 am on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

Question then,
If I already redirect to a subfolder on the server side, should I have the cloaked page in the same folder so that there is no folder difference?
for example:
www.somesite.com
redir to
www.somesite.com/somesite/

thats what a viewer would see.
now if it was a spider
it would redir to
www.somesite.com/somesite/spidypage.aspx?

Air




msg:679012
 3:55 pm on May 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

There is a thread here [webmasterworld.com] that goes into a fair bit of detail on how server side cloaking without redirection retrieves and serves content.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Cloaking
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved