homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.201.253
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Cloaking
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Cloaking Forum

    
Cloaking - using images on spider pages
Canton




msg:676326
 11:00 pm on Dec 11, 2001 (gmt 0)

Since traditionally engines have indexed text on a page and nothing else, it would stand to reason that pages that are fed only to spiders should just have text on them and no images. I know that Google and some others now read the names of image files, but that's not important with cloaking...or so it would seem...

If a page has no images at all, isn't that kind of out of the ordinary? Would a spider potentially pick up on this fact or at least have some kind of notification for a human admin at the engine? If so, I would think placing images even on pages that won't be seen by humans (cloaked pages) is a good idea, but otherwise I can't see any advantages and would simply use an all-text page...any thoughts and/or definitive answers?

~Canton

 

littleman




msg:676327
 11:08 pm on Dec 11, 2001 (gmt 0)

I would put the images in, it is just good insurance.

Air




msg:676328
 1:46 am on Dec 12, 2001 (gmt 0)

I wouldn't make it image heavy, but including a logo and a sprinkling of images is part of the recipe to making good pages for the spiders. Remember they still see the image tags, it will also more easily pass muster if it is human reviewed. Pages with images tend to upease a perception of spam.

Bing Sharples




msg:676329
 7:13 pm on Dec 12, 2001 (gmt 0)

Concurred.........web-position gold certainly indicates that the spiders look for the image ALT text. Lets face it if you were designing an engine algorithm with anti-spam in mind wouldn't you??

ebgreen




msg:676330
 10:27 am on Dec 13, 2001 (gmt 0)

I have rankings on GOOGLE just from ALT Text.

tilt




msg:676331
 5:42 am on Dec 14, 2001 (gmt 0)

What if you're targetting Lynx? Does this mean that sites designed for Lynx rank poorly, or are considered spam?

Air




msg:676332
 6:08 am on Dec 14, 2001 (gmt 0)

>Does this mean that sites designed for Lynx rank poorly, or are considered spam?

No, not at all, quite the reverse actually. But if only the search engine pages are designed ;) for Lynx, while others see pages optimized for image capable browsers, then a logo and a sprinkling of images on the Lynx optimized pages won't hurt.

>What if you're targetting Lynx?
Really? You target Lynx in your page design? :) :)

tilt




msg:676333
 7:28 am on Dec 14, 2001 (gmt 0)

>Really? You target Lynx in your page design?
Umm. Doesn't everyone? :)

(I forgot to add <hypothetical> and </hypothetical> tags to my question.) :)

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Cloaking
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved