homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.161.214.221
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / HTML
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL

HTML Forum

    
What's the best dot?
cross platform ASCII symbol
bill




msg:579434
 6:52 am on Aug 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

I'm making an outline style "side of the page" navigation menu and wanted to put bullets next to some of the items. My question is, what's the best ASCII code to use?

I really want to use this: • & # 1 4 9 ; but I read [url=www.niwi.knaw.nl/SFgate/waiszoek/iso8859b.htm]here[/url] that this, along with • & bull; are Microsoft Windows Latin-1 Characters. If this is the case, am I limited to using the rather wimpy · & # 183; or its equivalent · & middot;?

What's the most cross platform dot?

 

Woz




msg:579435
 7:38 am on Aug 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

I cheat and make up a wee gif.

Onya
Woz

bill




msg:579436
 8:35 am on Aug 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

No cheating! ;)
I need the ASCII because there are a lot of the little buggers.

tedster




msg:579437
 8:39 am on Aug 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

Have you considered using a true unordered list <ul> and letting the browser draw the dot?

bill




msg:579438
 8:55 am on Aug 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

The only reason I hadn't gone the <ul> route is that the CSS will need to be tweaked. Before I go through that agony, I wanted to see if there was a way just to add the dot manually.

tedster




msg:579439
 9:28 am on Aug 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

Well, I'd say you're right about not using & # 1 4 9 ; -- On my PC (Win98) Netscape 4.77 renders it as a space. Explorer 6, Opera 5 and Netscape 6.1 render the filled circle.

highman




msg:579440
 9:35 am on Aug 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

I say use the <ul><li> and tweak with .css its not that diff. and is cross browser

bill




msg:579441
 11:04 am on Aug 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

I'm beginning to think that way myself...<ul> & CSS tweaking...thanks for the help everyone.

bill




msg:579442
 6:18 am on Aug 28, 2001 (gmt 0)

Along these same lines, could you guys tell me whether the Japanese Yen sign () &# 187; in ASCII character reference or () & yen; entity name are visible cross platform? This character falls under the ISO 8859-1 (Latin-1) Entities, so hopefully it should be fairly universal.

Brett_Tabke




msg:579443
 9:47 am on Aug 28, 2001 (gmt 0)

I'd go with middot.

If that doesn't work for you, I'd do Tedsters suggestion and use unordered lists. Just put the css info right in the UL that will override any css file or pre declarations you may have. <ul style....>

bill




msg:579444
 4:25 am on Aug 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

Brett, I think you've got something there with & middot;
I did a little test on some Win32 machines (Windows 95, NT & 2000) and here's what I found:

IE 5.01 & #149; yes & bull; yes & #183; yes & middot; yes
IE 3.02 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; no & middot; yes
Opera 5.12 & #149; yes & bull; yes & #183; yes & middot; yes
Opera 4.0 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; yes
Mozilla 0.9.3 & #149; yes & bull; yes & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 4.75 & #149; yes & bull; yes & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 4.5 & #149; yes & bull; yes & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 4.08 & #149; yes & bull; yes & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 4.07 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 4.03 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 3.04 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 3.03 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 3.02 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 3.01 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 3.0 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; yes
Netscape 2.02 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; no
Mosaic 3.0 & #149; yes & bull; no & #183; yes & middot; yes
Amaya 4.2.1 & #149; yes & bull; yes & #183; yes & middot; yes

Concerning the Japanese Yen symbol, this worked in every browser except IE 3.02. Neither & #187; or & yen; worked on IE 3.02 (even on a Japanese OS). I also couldn't get & #187; to work on Amaya 4.2.1, but that's more of an editor than a browser...

ggrot




msg:579445
 8:22 pm on Aug 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

<strong><big></big></strong>

Marcia




msg:579446
 12:38 am on Aug 30, 2001 (gmt 0)

I received an email a while back from someone who said that my unordered lists were not rendering properly in the version of Netscape she was using. She recommended that I use the closing tag for browser compatibility reasons and suggested using:

<li>Text here.</li>

Not too bad an idea anyway, since XHTML requires that all tags be closed.

msr986




msg:579447
 12:57 am on Aug 30, 2001 (gmt 0)

What you heard about netscape is true. Some versions do not render <li> correctly without the ending </li> tag. Also the <li> tag Must be placed within a <ul> tag set.

This is not a bug. Technically the <li> tag can only be placed within <ul> tags, and the </li> is required.

<li>This will not work with Netscape</li>

<ul>
<li>You need to do this</li>
</ul>

The only trouble with that arrangement is the the <ul> tag will indent the text.

<li> alone works fine in IE.

MSR

Brett_Tabke




msg:579448
 11:43 am on Aug 30, 2001 (gmt 0)

ggrot, that's interesting. I assume those browsers that support <BIG> would also support middot. BIG is html 4.0, while middot char entity is html 3.2.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / HTML
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved