homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.173.169
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / HTML
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL

HTML Forum

    
The infamous <BLINK> Tag </BLINK>
Pleeeeaaaaase prove me it is bad for SEO!
Macguru




msg:602141
 1:19 pm on Mar 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

I got this prospect with a good healty product ans a good healty attitude. But it's Web site stinks as hell! I can see 7 blinking phrases on a single page! The site was "designed" by some Front Page addict at a dirt cheap price. I defenitly want to see thoses go away!

Please tell me you know those blink tags can affect his rankings. I am down on my knees for someone here to tell me some site was rejected on some directory because of it.

As for the rest of the site I can remove those </font></font></font>, add a couple of page titles,heading,comments,metatags,keywords,alt,noframes,frame names and such here and there to try to make it worth a submission.

 

henki




msg:602142
 2:24 pm on Mar 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

Do they work with IE theese days??
As far as I recall they didnīt.

Just tell your client that they might scare the spiders off with all that blinking. ;)

Mike_Mackin




msg:602143
 2:31 pm on Mar 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

I would think that stuff would have an effect on a human editor. Just like pop-ups. Why take the chance?

Macguru




msg:602144
 3:03 pm on Mar 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

Fortunatly for IE users thoses pages look almost decent. The infamous tag is indeed not supported. Hope human editors uses it, it does certainly have an effect on me.

I will keep this site far away from ANY HTML validator. It would crash the poor machine.

Mike_Mackin




msg:602145
 3:07 pm on Mar 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

May human editors will use both IE & NS.

rcjordan




msg:602146
 3:40 pm on Mar 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

>that stuff would have an effect on a human editor

Mackin's right. I'd use the "It may hurt us in the directories, and its benefits are not worth the risk" as an reason to present to the client. It's subjective, but plenty of SEO is based on minimizing risks.

Macguru




msg:602147
 4:13 pm on Mar 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

>It may hurt us in the directories, and its benefits are not worth the risk

Benefits? You said benefits?
Jesus! Thank you rc! You found a good way to put it in words. Before working in SEO, did you had any Diplomatic background?

rcjordan




msg:602148
 4:24 pm on Mar 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

>Diplomatic background?

Better. Computer sales in the trenches. Features and Benefits, Features and Benefits, Features and Benefits, Features and Benefits, Features and Benefits, Features and Benefits, Features and Benefits, ........

Brett_Tabke




msg:602149
 1:33 pm on Mar 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

:-) (I can't resist). In a word: Opera.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / HTML
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved