| 3:47 am on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Oh no! Well, I'm curious where you heard this. Evidently there are no downloads available on the NS site:
All I see is 4.79.
Still don't know why they still offer the download. I think they should push a 6.xx browser.
| 4:10 am on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Its available on their ftp site - typically takes a couple of days from there to appear on the web site and for release notes to be available.
| 4:41 am on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Must be for the antique browser buffs.
| 4:45 am on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Surprised that they even use any energy to support that stuff any more. Gotta be a waste of programming effort. Any release notes on the FTP site as to what's being fixed?
| 10:36 am on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
> Surprised that they even use any energy to support that stuff any more
Yeah, NS who shut down their support for the 'hitometer' website stats due to "limited resources."
| 12:25 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
This is extremely curious. So far it's an empty folder (well, it's a 550 denied file) created on 8/15/02
It makes no sense to me right now, that's for sure.
Thing is, 4.8 would be a Communicator number, not a stand alone browser. Maybe it's a fix for those who still love the mail client? Even that would be hard to believe.
| 1:22 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Why should they stop fixing bugs? They have stopped adding features long ago. I also wouldn't get too excited about the 4.8 version number. My guess is that they named it that way simply because they ran out of 4.7x numbers for the bugfixes... ;)
| 1:36 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Some people do have it. Point your newsgroup to secnews.netscape.com and you'll see some posts about it, for example in netscape.public.general.
I agree with you bird. Probably bug fixes. And I'm guessing there are a lot of intranets around that they have to keep supporting.
here's the link where it can be downloaded, just in case anyone really wants it:
| 2:09 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Hey, I love Netscape 4.X
I dont get no hassle from sites with nimda and sircam type viruses. I dont get simialr viruses using the mail client.
Ok, it dont look pretty in some places but its quick, cheep n cheerful. Best of all - it aint Micro$haft.
I just installed 4.8. Cant see no difference.
| 2:41 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Where is that download available?
| 2:42 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
type or copy/paste that link I posted into your browser. You can't get there by drilling from the top down in an ftp client.
| 2:48 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Screwed up ftp server. I couldn't get it with netscape, opera, leech, or wsftp. I finally fired up IE and downloaded it.
| 2:55 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
If I copy/paste from opera, I get a %20 or space character where the line breaks. Remove that space and opera will download it.
| 6:49 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I'm sure they're supporting it still for the simple fact that NS 6 and above are real pigs and if you've got an older machine, you need 4.X just to make it go.
| 6:50 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Is there a change log any where?
| 7:26 pm on Aug 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
This doesn't seem to include 4.8 but it's got all the others so perhaps 4.8 will show up soon.
| 5:05 am on Aug 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
NS 6 and MSN 6 come complete with spyware, I'll stick with a version MSN 5 and NS 4, plus the viruses don't get out of the NS mail reader into your computer.
| 5:43 am on Aug 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I'm using Mozilla 1, not NS6. I'm curious about the spyware on NS6. I have a couple of clients that are using it. What is it?
And, same spyware on Moz 1?
| 1:20 am on Aug 22, 2002 (gmt 0)|
What spyware comes with NS6 and IE6? Never heard of that. I know IE can download various spyware/thiefware behind your back if ActiveX settings are not set to notify you before download.
The interesting thing is some people consider various actions/software to be spyware when in fact they are not.
| 3:49 pm on Aug 22, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I've been following Mozilla and Netscape 6+ since they started boosting about the new Gecko engine. I've never heard anything about sypware. Is there any evidence to prove this clam?
I would imagine if someone ran Adaware on a system with NS6 it would pick up any common spyware. Normally I would be shocked if Netscape Communications would put spyware in but since they are now owned by AOL it wouldn't surprise me.
| 12:47 am on Aug 23, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I don't see any html or dom related issues as far as the browser is concerned. (other than a caching problem)